Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Johannes KniessORCiD
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Liberal neutrality compels governments to respect individual preferences. Yet health-promotion campaigns, such as modern tobacco control policies, often seek to cultivate a preference for a healthy lifestyle. Liberal theorists have attempted to justify these policies by appealing to the concept of ‘means paternalism’, whereby these policies align with existing preferences. In contrast, this article argues that shaping preferences can be not only permissible but also morally required. Governments can preserve neutrality while influencing preferences by promoting generic goods valued in diverse societies and considering the preference-formation of future generations. This argument provides a stronger rationale for tobacco control policies.
Author(s): Kniess J
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Economics and Philosophy
Year: 2024
Pages: epub ahead of print
Online publication date: 23/09/2024
Acceptance date: 27/07/2024
Date deposited: 05/11/2024
ISSN (print): 0266-2671
ISSN (electronic): 1474-0028
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
URL: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267124000233
DOI: 10.1017/S0266267124000233
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric