Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Jie ZhangORCiD
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
© 2024 Elsevier Ltd. The prediction of ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) for total phenolic content (TPC) and total flavonoid content (TFC) from Carthamus caeruleus L. rhizomes was conducted using a Gaussian process regression model (GPR) with a multi-objective Grey Wolf optimization approach (MOGWO). A central composite design (CCD) was employed first, examining ethanol concentration, temperature, time, and solvent-to-solid ratio as independent variables. TPC and TFC responses were analyzed under various conditions, revealing significant quadratic and interaction effects (p < 0.05). The GPR was then utilized to predict TPC and TFC, showing high accuracy with correlation coefficients near 1 and minimal root mean square error (RMSE) values. To simultaneously maximize TPC and TFC, the MOGWO was used in a multi-objective framework. Validation through CCD and GPR highlighted GPR's superior predictive accuracy. Optimal conditions (10 % ethanol, 40°C, 20 minutes sonication, and 50 mL g−1 solvent to solid ratio) showed significant discrepancies in CCD predictions but high accuracy in GPR predictions. An interactive tool predicts TPC and TFC using CCD and GPR models. Users input extraction parameters and receive predictions, with a GWO-based optimization module for optimal conditions. The interface enables model comparison, improves process understanding, and optimizes bioactive compound extraction.
Author(s): Moussa H, Dahmoune F, Lekmine S, Mameri A, Tahraoui H, Hamid S, Benzitoune N, Moula N, Zhang J, Amrane A
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Process Biochemistry
Year: 2024
Volume: 147
Pages: 476-488
Print publication date: 01/12/2024
Online publication date: 23/10/2024
Acceptance date: 21/10/2024
Date deposited: 26/11/2024
ISSN (print): 1359-5113
ISSN (electronic): 1873-3298
Publisher: Elsevier Ltd
URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2024.10.009
DOI: 10.1016/j.procbio.2024.10.009
ePrints DOI: 10.57711/17dp-fh87
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric