Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

Does Time to Asystole in Donors After Circulatory Death Impact Recipient Outcome in Liver Transplantation?

Lookup NU author(s): Abdullah Malik, Dr Sam Tingle, Dr Ruth Owen, Dr Balaji Mahendran, Rodrigo Figueiredo, Dr Aimen Amer, Steven White, Professor Derek Manas, Professor Colin Wilson

Downloads


Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND).


Abstract

Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. BACKGROUND: The agonal phase can vary following treatment withdrawal in donor after circulatory death (DCD). There is little evidence to support when procurement teams should stand down in relation to donor time to death (TTD). We assessed what impact TTD had on outcomes following DCD liver transplantation. METHODS: Data were extracted from the UK Transplant Registry on DCD liver transplant recipients from 2006 to 2021. TTD was the time from withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment to asystole, and functional warm ischemia time was the time from donor systolic blood pressure and/or oxygen saturation falling below 50 mm Hg and 70%, respectively, to aortic perfusion. The primary endpoint was 1-y graft survival. Potential predictors were fitted into Cox proportional hazards models. Adjusted restricted cubic spline models were generated to further delineate the relationship between TTD and outcome. RESULTS: One thousand five hundred fifty-eight recipients of a DCD liver graft were included. Median TTD in the entire cohort was 13 min (interquartile range, 9-17 min). Restricted cubic splines revealed that the risk of graft loss was significantly greater when TTD ≤14 min. After 14 min, there was no impact on graft loss. Prolonged hepatectomy time was significantly associated with graft loss (hazard ratio, 1.87; 95% confidence interval, 1.23-2.83; P = 0.003); however, functional warm ischemia time had no impact (hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.44-2.27; P > 0.9). CONCLUSIONS: A very short TTD was associated with increased risk of graft loss, possibly because of such donors being more unstable and/or experiencing brain stem death as well as circulatory death. Expanding the stand down times may increase the utilization of donor livers without significantly impairing graft outcome.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Malik AK, Tingle SJ, Varghese C, Owen R, Mahendran B, Figueiredo R, Amer AO, Currie IS, White SA, Manas DM, Wilson CH

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Transplantation

Year: 2024

Volume: 108

Issue: 11

Pages: 2238-2246

Print publication date: 01/11/2024

Acceptance date: 04/04/2024

Date deposited: 11/11/2024

ISSN (print): 0041-1337

ISSN (electronic): 1534-6080

Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

URL: https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000005074

DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000005074

PubMed id: 38780399


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Share