Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

A single risk assessment for the most common diseases of ageing, developed and validated on 10 cohort studies

Lookup NU author(s): Professor Fiona MatthewsORCiD

Downloads


Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).


Abstract

© The Author(s) 2024.Background: We aimed to develop risk tools for dementia, stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), and diabetes, for adults aged ≥ 65 years using shared risk factors. Methods: Data were obtained from 10 population-based cohorts (N = 41,755) with median follow-up time (years) for dementia, stroke, MI, and diabetes of 6.2, 7.0, 6.8, and 7.4, respectively. Disease-free participants at baseline were included, and 22 risk factors (sociodemographic, medical, lifestyle, laboratory biomarkers) were evaluated. Two risk tools (DemNCD and DemNCD-LR based on Fine and Gray sub-distribution and logistic regression [LR], respectively) were developed and validated. Predictive accuracies of these risk tools were assessed using Harrel’s C-statistics and area under the curve (AUC) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Model calibration was conducted using Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness of fit test along calibration plots. Results: Both the DemNCD and DemNCD-LR resulted in similar predictive accuracy for each outcome. The overall AUC (95% CI) for dementia, stroke, MI, and diabetes risk tool were 0·68 (0·65, 0·70), 0·58 (0·54, 0·61), 0·65 (0·61, 0·68), and 0·68 (0·64, 0·72), respectively, for males. For females, these figures were 0·65 (0·63, 0·67), 0·55 (0·52, 0·57), 0·65 (0·62, 0·68), and 0·61 (0·57, 0·65). Conclusions: The DemNCD is the first tool to predict both dementia and multiple cardio-metabolic diseases using comprehensive risk factors and provided similar predictive accuracy to existing risk tools. It has similar predictive accuracy as tools designed for single outcomes in this age-group. DemNCD has the potential to be used in community and clinical settings as it includes self-reported and routinely available clinical measures.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Huque MH, Kootar S, Kiely KM, Anderson CS, van Boxtel M, Brodaty H, Sachdev PS, Carlson M, Fitzpatrick AL, Whitmer RA, Kivipelto M, Jorm L, Kohler S, Lautenschlager NT, Lopez OL, Shaw JE, Matthews FE, Peters R, Anstey KJ

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: BMC Medicine

Year: 2024

Volume: 22

Issue: 1

Print publication date: 01/12/2024

Online publication date: 31/10/2024

Acceptance date: 17/10/2024

Date deposited: 19/11/2024

ISSN (electronic): 1741-7015

Publisher: BioMed Central Ltd

URL: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-024-03711-6

DOI: 10.1186/s12916-024-03711-6

Data Access Statement: No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study

PubMed id: 39482675


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Funding

Funder referenceFunder name
Australian Research Council Fellowship FL190100011
NHMRC GNT1171279
NHMRC Investigator Grant APP1173952

Share