Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Chris MarshallORCiD, Dr Sara Graziadio
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Evidence reviews are important for informing decision-making and primary research, but they can be time-consuming and costly. With the advent of artificial intelligence, including machine learning, there is an opportunity to accelerate the review process at many stages, with study screening identified as a prime candidate for assistance. Despite the availability of a large number of tools promising to assist with study screening, these are not consistently used in practice and there is skepticism about their application. Single-arm evaluations suggest the potential for tools to reduce screening burden. However, their integration into practice may need further investigation through evaluations of outcomes such as overall resource use and impact on review findings and recommendations. Because the literature lacks comparative studies, it is not currently possible to determine their relative accuracy. In this commentary, we outline the published research and discuss options for incorporating tools into the review workflow, considering the needs and requirements of different types of review.
Author(s): Chappell M, Edwards M, Watkins W, Marshall C, Graziadio S
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Cochrane Evidence Synthesis Methods
Year: 2023
Volume: 1
Issue: 5
Online publication date: 20/07/2023
Acceptance date: 25/06/2023
Date deposited: 10/11/2025
ISSN (electronic): 2832-9023
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons Ltd
URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/cesm.12021
DOI: 10.1002/cesm.12021
Data Access Statement: Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric