Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Professor Barbara HanrattyORCiD
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
© 2025 The Author(s). Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Introduction: Information on care home residents in England is captured in numerous data sets (care home records, General Practitioner records, community nursing, etc.) but little of this information is currently analysed in a way that is useful for care providers, current or future residents and families or that realises the potential of data to enhance care provision. The DACHA study aimed to develop and test a minimum data set (MDS) which would bring together data that is useful to support and improve care and facilitate research. It is that utility that underscores the importance of meaningful public involvement (PI) with the range of groups of people affected. This paper analyses the involvement of family members of care home residents and care home staff through a PI Panel. Objectives: The objective for the PI activities was to consistently bring the knowledge and perspectives of family members and care home staff to influence the ongoing design and conduct of the DACHA study. Methods: The bespoke methods of PI included a dedicated PI team and a PI Panel of public contributors. Meetings were recorded and minutes agreed, resulting actions were tracked and reflections on the PI recorded. A democratic, social relations approach was used to frame the analysis. Results: A PI panel met 17 times. All meetings included both family members and care home staff. Analysis of the records and reflections developed the following themes about the operation of the PI: deepened understanding of the data environment in care homes; Influence on the pilot MDS; aiming for best research practices with care homes; personal/professional development for PI members; expectations of the project. Learning points for future research projects are developed. Conclusions: PI shaped the design and conduct of the DACHA study, grounding it in the needs and perspectives of people using and providing social care. Data research has a huge responsibility to accurately incorporate relevant public perspectives. There is an implicit assumption that records and data are objective and ‘speak for themselves’ however there can be unintended consequences from introduction of new data requirements in practice. Patient or Public Contribution: Public contributors to this manuscript include family members of older people living in care homes and staff of care homes. The wider study also involved as the public, older people living in care homes. Public contributors helped develop the project, contributed throughout the conduct of the study and some chose to be involved in preparing this manuscript.
Author(s): Killett A, Micklewright K, Carroll R, Akdur G, Allinson E, Crellin L, de Corte K, Fox M, Hanratty B, Irvine L, Jones L, Kelly M, Lloyd T, Meyer J, Spilsbury K, Towers A-M, Tracey F, Willmott J, Goodman C
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Health Expectations
Year: 2025
Volume: 28
Issue: 1
Print publication date: 01/02/2025
Online publication date: 13/01/2025
Acceptance date: 17/12/2024
Date deposited: 27/01/2025
ISSN (print): 1369-6513
ISSN (electronic): 1369-7625
Publisher: John Wiley and Sons Inc
URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.70140
DOI: 10.1111/hex.70140
Data Access Statement: The authors have nothing to report.
See more details
