Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Nikki Godden-Rasul
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Tort law can be considered antithetical to radical politics for transformative social change. Predicated on incremental reforms and intertwined with a market-based insurance system, tort law commodifies and (re)produces hierarchies of harms along the lines of gender, race, class and other social relations. Nevertheless, feminists have explored whether it can be harnessed to address social and gendered harms, while recognising that improving the current system can entrench it and the underpinning structural injustices. As such, the critical question is about knowing how and when it is worth mobilising tort law. Drawing on law and social movement scholarship and abolitionist conceptions of non-reformist reforms, I set out a taxonomy of indirect impacts of law and alternative political goals to legal change. This taxonomy should guide decision-making as to when, in relation to a specific issue at a particular time, it is strategically useful to mobilise tort law for intersectional feminist struggles.
Author(s): Godden-Rasul N
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Social & Legal Studies
Year: 2025
Pages: Epub ahead of print
Online publication date: 26/02/2025
Acceptance date: 03/02/2025
Date deposited: 28/02/2025
Publisher: Sage Publications Ltd.
URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/09646639251322752
DOI: 10.1177/09646639251322752
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric