Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Professor Vijay KunadianORCiD
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2025. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ Group.Background: Clinical trials and meta-analyses indicate a reduced reinfarction risk with invasive management in older patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). This study investigated whether similar benefits might be observed in frail patients. Methods: The coMOrbilidades Síndrome Coronario Agudo - FRAIL (MOSCA-FRAIL) trial included 167 adults aged ≥70 years with frailty (Clinical Frailty Scale ≥4 points) and NSTEMI, who were randomised to invasive (n=84) or conservative (n=83) strategy during the index hospitalisation. The primary end point of this subanalysis was reinfarction, considering all-cause mortality as a competing event, at a 3-year median follow-up. The time to first reinfarction and all reinfarctions (first and recurrent) were considered. The substudy was not prespecified. Results: The total number of deaths (93, 56%) exceeded that of first reinfarctions (32, 19%). Invasive treatment did not influence the reinfarction risk when accounting for death as a competing risk (subdistribution HR=0.87, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.40, p=0.56). An initially increased mortality risk with invasive management (significant between days 131 and 175) shifted to a lower mortality risk over time. A total of 45 reinfarctions (first and recurrent) were observed. The longitudinal trajectories corroborated that the invasive strategy did not reduce the risk of reinfarction over time (p=0.72). However, mortality followed a biphasic pattern, with higher mortality in the invasive group during the first 6 months and a reduction between 9 months and 3 years (p=0.05 for the entire time-dependent trajectory). The win ratio for the invasive strategy versus the conservative strategy was 1.08 (95% CI 0.72 to 1.63, p=0.70). Conclusions: In older adults with frailty and NSTEMI, routine invasive management did not reduce the reinfarction risk at a 3-year follow-up. The high all-cause mortality associated with frailty may limit the impact of invasive management. Due to the limited sample size and risk for type II error, these findings should be considered hypothesis-generating.
Author(s): Sanchis J, Bueno H, Marti Sanchez D, Martinez-Selles M, Diez Villanueva P, Barrabes JA, Marin F, Villa A, Sanmartin Fernandez M, Llibre C, Sionis A, Elizaga J, Alfonso F, Nunez E, Nunez J, Kunadian V, Ariza-Sole A
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Heart
Year: 2025
Pages: epub ahead of print
Online publication date: 08/02/2025
Acceptance date: 21/01/2025
ISSN (print): 1355-6037
ISSN (electronic): 1468-201X
Publisher: BMJ Publishing Group
URL: https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2024-325254
DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2024-325254
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric
