Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

PANenteric Crohn's capsule versus Ileo-Colonoscopy and Scan: An embedded qualitative study exploring the views and experiences of patients with established Crohn's disease

Lookup NU author(s): Dr Nicola HallORCiD, Dr Helen CloseORCiD

Downloads

Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.


Abstract

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2025. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ Group.Objective: This study aimed to explore patient experience and preferences for different investigation modalities for surveillance and assessment of disease activity and mucosal healing in patients with established Crohn's disease (CD). Method: A qualitative interview study embedded within a UK-based pragmatic trial of panenteric capsule endoscopy (PillCam Crohn's capsule, PCC) compared with ileocolonoscopy (IC) and magnetic resonance enterography (MRE). Telephone semi-structured interviews were completed with 10 patients with established CD who had undergone all three modalities. Results: A range of advantages and disadvantages relating to all three modalities were described. PCC was generally reported as being easy to swallow and associated with less discomfort, intrusiveness and pain than IC. Negative attributions associated with unpleasantness of IC were common; however, the intensity of associated emotions, rather than their presence, seems to have the greatest influence on procedure preference. Tolerance of investigative procedures can be moderated by acceptance and recognition of their necessity in management of CD and perceived effectiveness of the procedures. Other key influences include the importance of support and trust in clinical and nursing staff and the ability to manage procedure and appointment requirements within daily life and responsibilities. Conclusions: Findings suggest that for many, although not all, patients with CD, there would be a clear preference for PCC over IC and MRE, if effectiveness is proven to be equivalent. This supports the need for further work to demonstrate use and effectiveness with a view to integration within current management guidelines and care pathways in line with patient preference. Trial registration number: NCT04274010.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Lee PS, Hall N, Davison C, McAlindon M, Sidhu R, Dhar A, Chattree A, Close H, Panter S

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Frontline Gastroenterology

Year: 2025

Pages: epub ahead of print

Online publication date: 25/07/2025

Acceptance date: 14/07/2025

ISSN (print): 2041-4137

ISSN (electronic): 2041-4145

Publisher: BMJ Publishing Group

URL: https://doi.org/10.1136/flgastro-2025-103168

DOI: 10.1136/flgastro-2025-103168


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Share