Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Elizabeth Turk
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
Considering the legacy of seven decades of Soviet medicine, Western or ‘European medicine’ dominates public health discourse today, and guided most Mongolians’ medical decisions for COVID-19 prevention and treatment. However, over a year into the pandemic, the Mongolian Ministry of Health endorsed traditional medicine as a complimentary strategy for the treatment of mild and moderate COVID-19 cases, a decision coinciding with skyrocketing transmission rates, extreme lock-down measures, and an unprepared and aging medical infrastructure. This article explores how traditional medicine came to be seen as a legitimate strategy in combating COVID-19, and officially endorsed by the state. Drawing on Bourdieu’s work, it suggests that nationalism as doxic knowledge played an important role in legitimacy-making, but not in isolation. By framing traditional medicine as biomedically efficacious, thereby appealing to the disposition to Western conventions of scientific rationality widely held in public culture, traditional medicine was made more palatable to the public.
Author(s): Turk E
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Central Asian Survey
Year: 2025
Volume: 44
Issue: 4
Pages: 543-565
Online publication date: 10/10/2025
Acceptance date: 22/07/2025
ISSN (print): 0263-4937
ISSN (electronic): 1465-3354
Publisher: Routledge
URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/02634937.2025.2542265
DOI: 10.1080/02634937.2025.2542265
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric