Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

Systematic Review: The Relationship Between the Faecal Microbiome and Colorectal Neoplasia in Shotgun Metagenomic Studies

Lookup NU author(s): Dr Sarah Manning, Dr Eleanor Hackney, Dr Yashvee DunneramORCiD, Professor Christopher StewartORCiD, Dr Bano Louca, Dr Nick Meader, Professor Linda SharpORCiD, Professor Colin Rees

Downloads


Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).


Abstract

© 2025 The Author(s). Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Background: The human gut microbiome is of academic and clinical interest. Associations between certain organisms and colorectal neoplasia have been reported, but findings have limited reproducibility in different populations. Methods: We performed a systematic review of whole metagenome shotgun sequencing studies using faecal samples from patients with colorectal neoplasia and control populations. Searches were performed on 30th June 2023. We identified 26 studies, reporting on 22 study populations (13 from Asia, five from Europe and four from North America). Study size ranged from 14 to 971 individuals (mean 170). Results: Some reproducible data were identified, such as the significant enrichment of Fusobacterium nucleatum and Parvimonas micra in colorectal cancer patients compared to controls (in 10 and nine studies, respectively). However, 21 out of 26 studies scored poorly on quality appraisal, specifically surrounding selection of cases and controls. Definitions of controls varied; some studies used individuals with normal endoscopic investigations, some used ‘healthy’ individuals where no colonoscopy was performed, and one used those with non-neoplastic findings (haemorrhoids). There was even less reproducibility of data in studies where individuals with colorectal polyps were compared to controls, possibly because of heterogeneity in these patient groupings as a variety of definitions for ‘polyp cases’ were used. Conclusions: Heterogeneity and potential for bias indicates that findings should be interpreted with caution. Standardised protocols to ensure robust methodology and allow pooling of large-scale data are required before these findings can be used in clinical practice (PROSPERO: CRD42023431977).


Publication metadata

Author(s): Manning S, Hackney E, Dunneram Y, Hull MA, Mitra S, Stewart CJ, Louca P, Meader N, Sharp L, Rees C

Publication type: Review

Publication status: Published

Journal: Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics

Year: 2025

Volume: 62

Issue: 6

Pages: 568-584

Print publication date: 01/09/2025

Online publication date: 12/08/2025

Acceptance date: 17/06/2025

ISSN (print): 0269-2813

ISSN (electronic): 1365-2036

Publisher: John Wiley and Sons Inc

URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.70252

DOI: 10.1111/apt.70252

Data Access Statement: The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Share