Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Duaa Alqattan, Professor Raj Ranjan, Dr Varun OjhaORCiD
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND).
Hierarchical Federated Learning (HFL) extends traditional Federated Learning (FL) by introducing multi-level aggregation in which model updates pass through clients, edge servers, and a global server. While this hierarchical structure enhances scalability, it also increases vulnerability to adversarial attacks—such as data poisoning and model poisoning—that disrupt learning by introducing discrepancies at the edge server level. These discrepancies propagate through aggregation, affecting model consistency and overall integrity. Existing studies on adversarial behaviour in FL primarily rely on single-metric approaches—such as cosine similarity or Euclidean distance—to assess model discrepancies and filter out anomalous updates. However, these methods fail to capture the diverse ways adversarial attacks influence model updates, particularly in highly heterogeneous data environments and hierarchical structures. Attackers can exploit the limitations of single-metric defences by crafting updates that seem benign under one metric while remaining anomalous under another. Moreover, prior studies have not systematically analysed how model discrepancies evolve over time, vary across regions, or affect clustering structures in HFL architectures. To address these limitations, we propose the Model Discrepancy Score (MDS), a multi-metric framework that integrates Dissimilarity, Distance, Uncorrelation, and Divergence to provide a comprehensive analysis of how adversarial activity affects model discrepancies. Through temporal, spatial, and clustering analyses, we examine how attacks affect model discrepancies at the edge server level in 3LHFL and 4LHFL architectures and evaluate MDS’s ability to distinguish between benign and malicious servers. Our results show that while 4LHFL effectively mitigates discrepancies in regional attack scenarios, it struggles with distributed attacks due to additional aggregation layers that obscure distinguishable discrepancy patterns over time, across regions, and within clustering structures. Factors influencing detection include data heterogeneity, attack sophistication, and hierarchical aggregation depth. These findings highlight the limitations of single-metric approaches and emphasize the need for multi-metric strategies such as MDS to enhance HFL security.
Author(s): Alqattan DS, Snasel V, Ranjan R, Ojha V
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: High-Confidence Computing
Year: 2025
Volume: 5
Issue: 4
Print publication date: 01/12/2025
Online publication date: 08/04/2025
Acceptance date: 24/03/2025
Date deposited: 09/10/2025
ISSN (electronic): 2667-2952
Publisher: Elsevier BV
URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hcc.2025.100321
DOI: 10.1016/j.hcc.2025.100321
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric
