Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

Health economic impact of early versus delayed treatment of herpes simplex virus encephalitis in the UK

Lookup NU author(s): Emeritus Professor Martin Eccles

Downloads


Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).


Abstract

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2025. Objective Thanks to the introduction of recent national guidelines for treating herpes simplex virus (HSV) encephalitis, health outcomes have improved. This paper evaluates the health system costs and the health-related quality of life implications of these guidelines. Design and setting A sub-analysis of data from a prospective, multi-centre, observational cohort ENCEPH-UK study conducted across 29 hospitals in the UK from 2012 to 2015. Study participants Data for patients aged ≥16 years with a confirmed HSV encephalitis diagnosis admitted for treatment with aciclovir were collected at discharge, 3 and 12 months. Primary and secondary outcome measures Patient health outcomes were measured by the Glasgow outcome score (GOS), modified ranking score (mRS) and the EuroQoL; healthcare costs were estimated per patient at discharge from hospital and at 12 months follow-up. In addition, Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) were calculated from the EQ-5D utility scores. Cost-utility analysis was performed using the NHS and Social Care perspective. Results A total of 49 patients were included; 35 were treated within 48 hours, € early' (median (IQR) 8.25 [3.7-20.5]) and 14 were treated after 48 hours € delayed' (median (IQR) 93.9 [66.7-100.1]). At discharge, 30 (86%) in the early treatment group had a good mRS outcome score (0-3) compared with 4 (29%) in the delayed group. According to GOS, 10 (29%) had a good recovery in the early treatment group, but only 1 (7%) in the delayed group. EQ-5D-3L utility value at discharge was significantly higher for early treatment (0.609 vs 0.221, p<0.000). After adjusting for age and symptom duration at admission, early treatment incurred a lower average cost at discharge, £23,086 (95% CI: £15,186 to £30,987) vs £42,405 (95% CI: £25,457 to £59,354) [p<0.04]. A -£20,218 (95% CI: -£52,173 to £11,783) cost difference was observed at the 12- month follow-up post discharge. Conclusions This study suggests that early treatment may be associated with better health outcomes and reduced patient healthcare costs, with a potential for savings to the NHS with faster treatment.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Navvuga P, Moore S, Hardwick H, Easton A, Michael BD, Kneen R, Griffiths M, Medina-Lara A, Solomon T, Backman R, Baker G, Beeching N, Breen R, Brown D, Cheyne C, Carrol E, Davies N, Defres S, Defres S, Easton A, Eccles M, Foy R, Garcia-Finana M, Granerod J, Griem J, Gummery A, Harris L, Hickey H, Hill H, Jacoby A, Kierans C, Kopelman M, Lancaster G, Levin M, McDonald R, Medina-Lara A, Menson E, Michael B, Martin N, Pennington A, Pollard A, Riley J, Sadarangani M, Salter A, Tharmaratnam K, Thornton M, Vincent A, Warlow C, Barlow G, Blanchard T, Body R, Boyd G, Cebria-Prejan L, Chadwick D, Cooke R, Crawford P, Davies B, Douthwaite S, Emsley H, Goldenberg S, Graham C, Green S, Hawkins C, Irish D, Jeffrey K, Jones M, Keating L, Keep J, Larkin S, Leita M, Macallan D, Minton J, Mohandas K, Moran E, Muir D, Pasztor M, Reed M, Solomon T, Stanley P, Sutton J, Thomas P, Thwaites G, Weir J, Zuckerman M

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: BMJ Open

Year: 2025

Volume: 15

Issue: 9

Print publication date: 01/09/2025

Online publication date: 18/09/2025

Acceptance date: 27/08/2025

Date deposited: 07/10/2025

ISSN (electronic): 2044-6055

Publisher: BMJ Publishing Group

URL: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088473

DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088473

Data Access Statement: All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.

PubMed id: 40973386


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Funding

Funder referenceFunder name
National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)
RP-PG-0108-10048National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)

Share