Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

Removal of antimicrobial resistance determinants from wastewater: Role of capacity overloading and treatment technology in wastewater treatment plants

Lookup NU author(s): Dr Rebeca Pallares Vega, Emeritus Professor David Graham

Downloads

Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.


Abstract

© 2025 Elsevier LtdThe transmission and spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global health concern. Thus, it is important to understand the fate of AMR in the environment, including resistant bacteria (ARBs) and their genes (ARGs), to reduce their wider spread. Well-operated wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) are an effective way of reducing ARGs and ARBs entering the environment, but how different technologies and WWTP operational capacities influence AMR releases is less well known. Here we quantified the fate of selected ARBs, heavy metals, ARGs (aph(3”)-Ib, blaCTX-M, blaNDM, ermF, qnrS, sul2 and tetW), intI1 (a mobile genetic element), the Escherichia coli uidA and the 16S rRNA genes through four different WWTPs discharging into the Musi River in Hyderabad, India. ARG removals ranged from 50 % to 99 %, depending on the gene, with sul2 levels remaining highest after treatment (∼106 copies/mL). Differences in ARG removals were seen between WWTPs, but it was hard to separate the effect of differing treatment technologies and plant capacity, partially because one of the WWTPs was overloaded. ARG removal efficiencies were significantly higher in the anaerobic and combined anaerobic-aerobic treatment systems compared with aerobic technologies alone (p < 0.01; Kruskal-Wallis test). For genes, no seasonal differences were found in influents, effluents and sludge, apart from uidA and blaCTX-M for the latter. The results underscore the complexity of defining ARG removal efficiency in WWTPs due to locally confounding factors such as capacity exceedance and the treatment technologies employed. “WWTPs” are not one thing and understanding how differences in technology, capacity, and the quality of operations affect AMR fate are key to ensuring that WWTPs reduce spread of AMR into the environment.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Sonkar V, Kashyap A, Pallares-Vega R, Sasidharan SS, Chandrakalabai Jambu S, Naorem N, Graham DW, Kreft J-U, Thatikonda S

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Journal of Environmental Management

Year: 2025

Volume: 395

Print publication date: 01/12/2025

Online publication date: 08/11/2025

Acceptance date: 01/11/2025

ISSN (print): 0301-4797

ISSN (electronic): 1095-8630

Publisher: Academic Press

URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.127897

DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.127897

PubMed id: 41207249


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Share