Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

Breakfast consumption does not rapidly increase liver or muscle glycogen content in well-trained cyclists

Lookup NU author(s): Professor Peter ThelwallORCiD

Downloads


Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).


Abstract

A carbohydrate-rich breakfast is commonly consumed by cyclists to compensate for an overnight decline in liver glycogen content and, as such, to maximize liver glycogen stores in the hours before exercise. However, the extent to which liver glycogen content increases in response to the intake of a carbohydrate-rich breakfast in well-trained cyclists remains unexplored. Twelve well-trained male cyclists (age: 25 ± 5 yr; V̇o2peak: 67 ± 5 mL·min-1·kg-1; Wmax: 5.8 ± 0.7 W·kg-1) participated in this trial. Carbon-13 magnetic resonance spectroscopy (13C-MRS) at 7 T and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 3 T were applied to assess muscle and liver glycogen concentrations and volume, respectively, before and 3 h after ingesting a carbohydrate-rich breakfast providing 3 g carbohydrates per kg body mass. Following breakfast ingestion, muscle glycogen concentrations, muscle volumes, and total muscle glycogen content did not change (P > 0.05). Liver glycogen concentrations increased by ∼10% (from 164 ± 30 to 180 ± 33 mmol/L; P = 0.036), whereas liver volumes decreased by ∼6% (from 1.96 ± 0.28 to 1.84 ± 0.27 L; P < 0.001) in the 3 h following breakfast ingestion. Consequently, no net change in overall liver glycogen content was observed following breakfast ingestion (from 53 ± 15 to 54 ± 13 g; P = 0.516). Ingesting a carbohydrate-rich breakfast (providing 3 g carbohydrates per kg body mass) does not elevate liver or muscle glycogen content during the subsequent 3-h postprandial period.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This is the first study to simultaneously assess both muscle and liver glycogen content following ingestion of a practical carbohydrate-rich breakfast in well-trained cyclists. No changes were observed in muscle glycogen concentrations or content. Liver glycogen concentrations increased postprandially, but liver glycogen content remained unchanged due to a concurrent decline in liver volume. These findings highlight the importance of accounting for liver volume changes when interpreting postprandial liver glycogen storage responses.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Fuchs CJ, Veeraiah P, Hermans WJH, Brauwers B, Voncken R, van Beek J, Brouwers K, van den Hurk J, Thelwall PE, Prompers JJ, van Loon LJC

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: American Journal of Physiology - Endocrinology and Metabolism

Year: 2025

Volume: 329

Issue: 5

Pages: E774-E780

Print publication date: 01/11/2025

Online publication date: 20/10/2025

Acceptance date: 09/10/2025

Date deposited: 27/11/2025

ISSN (print): 0193-1849

ISSN (electronic): 1522-1555

Publisher: American Physiological Society

URL: https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00400.2025

DOI: 10.1152/ajpendo.00400.2025

Data Access Statement: All data generated and analyzed during this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

PubMed id: 41115061


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Share