Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Judith ReynoldsORCiD
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
This chapter explores the communicative processes involved in producing witness statements in immigration visa applications and appeals settings, focusing attention on the co-constructed nature of the statement. Drawing on a single case study from two connected advice sessions with a lawyer, refugee client and interpreter, the chapter illustrates how participants work together to prepare a witness statement to counter the immigration authorities’ assertion that the client’s family relationships have been falsified. Analysis focusing on the rhetorical strategies employed in the writing of the statement reveals the fallacy of viewing it as a single-authored text for which the client bears sole responsibility. Rather, the chapter shows how each participant’s authorial voice shapes the co-construction of the witness statement, uncovering how the specialist knowledge and expertise (legal, linguistic, and contextual) of each co-author is necessary to building a successful evidential argument. It also illustrates how the discursive mediation work taking place during the interpreted lawyer-client interaction enhances the credibility and persuasiveness of the client’s statement.
Author(s): Reynolds J
Editor(s): Tatiana Grieshofer; Kate Haworth
Publication type: Book Chapter
Publication status: In Press
Book Title: Language and Justice: Communication in Legal Practice
Year: 2026
Acceptance date: 07/05/2025
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Place Published: Cambridge
URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/language-and-justice/0BE045D88577567A736FB3A4FFFD3DAC
Notes: 9781009540988 ebook ISBN.
Library holdings: Search Newcastle University Library for this item
ISBN: 9781009540957