Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Ríona McArdle, Dr Cameron KirkORCiD, Dr Silvia Del DinORCiD, Dr Brook Galna, Professor Alan ThomasORCiD, Professor Lynn RochesterORCiD
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
© 2025 The Alzheimer's Association. Alzheimer's & Dementia published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Alzheimer's Association. BACKGROUND: Posterior cortical atrophy (PCA) is a dementia subgroup commonly misdiagnosed due to unusual presentation and limited clinical awareness. Previously, the GaitDem study provided proof-of-concept for the use of accelerometery-based walking assessment in clinical and real-world settings in supporting differentiation Lewy body disease (LBD) and Alzheimer's disease (AD). Real-world walking assessment also provides insights into the impact of disease on everyday behaviours. Here, we aimed to assess the feasibility of accelerometery-based real-world walking assessment of PCA and describe differences between PCA and more prevalent neurodegenerative dementia syndromes, AD and LBD. METHODS: Fourteen participants with PCA (Age: 71 years (56-78); 57% female) wore an accelerometer (AX6, Axivity) affixed to their lower back for up to seven days. Using validated algorithms, real-world walking outcomes were derived including measures of walking quality (step velocity), volume (minutes spent walking, steps per day, bouts per day), pattern (mean bout duration) and variability (of bout durations). Data was compared to the GaitDem cohort, which included 36 people with AD (Age: 77 years (67-88); 58% female) and 46 with LBD (Age: 77 years (65-91); 17% female), following a similar protocol. Kruskal-Wallis Test assessed between-group differences with post-hoc Dunn tests. 26 controls (Age: 74(60-89), 58% female) were included for visual comparison (Figure 1). RESULTS: Twelve PCA participants completed seven days of real-world walking assessment; two completed 5-6 days. The PCA group walked faster, spent more minutes walking, took more steps and walking bouts per day (p <0.01 for all) than the LBD group; no significant differences were found for pattern and variability outcomes or between PCA and AD groups (p >0.05; Figure 1). CONCLUSION: All PCA participants completed real-world walking assessment for the recommended period of >3 days, suggesting feasibility. Preliminary results suggest that the PCA group's real-world macro walking behaviours are more similar to AD than LBD. Despite a small sample, this novel data provides proof-of-concept. Only real-world macro walking outcomes are reported. Previously, clinic-based accelerometery outcomes relating to micro gait characteristics (e.g. spatiotemporal and signal-based features) were more sensitive to differences between LBD and AD; this will be further explored for PCA.
Author(s): Mc Ardle R, Kirk C, Del Din S, Bai Y, Kaski D, Rohrer JD, Galna B, Thomas AJ, Rochester L, Bancroft MJ, Yong KXX
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Alzheimer's & Dementia
Year: 2025
Volume: 21
Issue: S9
Online publication date: 23/12/2025
Acceptance date: 02/04/2018
Date deposited: 07/01/2026
ISSN (print): 1552-5260
ISSN (electronic): 1552-5279
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/alz70863_110506
DOI: 10.1002/alz70863_110506
PubMed id: 41433360
Notes: Supplement: Technology and Dementia Preconference
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric
