ePrints

Mega-Analysis of Oscillatory and Aperiodic Resting-State EEG Alterations in Neurodegenerative Diseases

Lookup NU author(s): Professor John-Paul TaylorORCiD

Downloads

• Published version [.pdf]

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

Abstract

© 2025 The Alzheimer's Association. Alzheimer's & Dementia published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Alzheimer's Association. BACKGROUND: Resting-state EEG (rsEEG) alterations in the posterior alpha rhythm are promising biomarkers of neurodegenerative diseases (NDDs). However, spectral analysis often overlooks the rsEEG non-rhythmic (aperiodic) component. Studies assessing the oscillatory and aperiodic activity are scarce and frequently underpowered. While multicenter data pooling (mega-analysis) can enhance statistical power, it may introduce site-related differences (batch effects). This mega-analysis differentiates rsEEG oscillatory and aperiodic alterations across NDDs while mitigating batch effects. METHOD: RsEEGs from 1750 subjects across 12 sites were preprocessed. We pooled signals from healthy controls (HC = 583), Parkinson's Disease (PD = 131), Lewy Body Dementias (LBD = 96), Alzheimer's Disease (AD = 403), Frontotemporal Dementia (FTD = 36), Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) in Lewy Bodies pathology or PD (MCI-LBD = 34), MCI in AD spectrum (MCI-AD = 245), and Vascular Dementia (VD = 222); Figure 1A. Batch effects harmonization of the posterior power spectrum was performed with reComBat (age and diagnosis-adjusted). We evaluated harmonization through functional and mass-univariate permutation ANOVAs. Oscillatory and aperiodic parameters were extracted from the harmonized spectrum with specparam. Group differences across NDDs were estimated with bootstrap pairwise comparisons, mass-univariate permutation tests, and logistic regression models (age-adjusted). RESULT: Visualizations and statistical testing supported reduced batch effects after harmonization; Figure 1B and 1C. As consistent results in the unharmonized and harmonized data, steeper aperiodic parameters and lower oscillatory center frequency characterized LBD compared to all other groups. Besides, oscillatory extended alpha power was lower in AD than in HC and PD; Figure 2. Harmonized oscillatory center frequency and aperiodic parameters improved the separation of LBD compared to unharmonized parameters; Figure 3. CONCLUSION: Harmonization mitigates batch effects in the rsEEG posterior power spectrum. LBD is characterized by pronounced oscillatory frequency slowing and increased aperiodic activity, while AD displays both oscillatory and aperiodic abnormalities with smaller effect sizes.

Publication metadata

Author(s): Jaramillo-Jimenez A, Mantilla-Ramos YJ, Tovar D, Lopera F, Nino DFA, Gomez JFO, Paquet C, Gaubert S, Pardini M, Arnaldi D, Taylor J-P, Fladby T, Bronnick K, Aarsland D, Bonanni L

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Alzheimer's & Dementia

Year: 2025

Volume: 21

Issue: S2

Online publication date: 24/12/2025

Acceptance date: 02/04/2018

Date deposited: 08/01/2026

ISSN (print): 1552-5260

ISSN (electronic): 1552-5279

Publisher: John Wiley and Sons Inc.

URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/alz70856_103714

DOI: 10.1002/alz70856_103714

PubMed id: 41442883

Notes: Supplement: Biomarkers

Altmetrics

Share