Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

The case against hole injection through SAMs in perovskite solar cells

Lookup NU author(s): Dr Elisabetta Arca, Dr Pablo Docampo

Downloads


Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).


Abstract

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry, 2025. Self-assembled molecules (SAMs) are widely used as hole-selective contacts in perovskite solar cells (PSCs). They are traditionally designed to facilitate charge injection by aligning their highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) with the perovskite's valence band. However, interfacial energy barriers may not necessarily hinder performance, and in some cases, can boost the devices' open-circuit voltage, thereby improving efficiency. This raises an important question: is injection through the SAM, to promote charge extraction, a necessary or even desirable criterion? To investigate this, we compare two Spiro-OMeTAD derivatives: Spiro-A, which is directly attached to the indium-doped tin oxide (ITO) anode by a carboxylic acid moiety, forcing the HOMO level to be in close proximity to the ITO, and Spiro-B, which incorporates a spacer group to separate the HOMO from ITO spatially. Contrary to expectations, Spiro-B achieves a higher open-circuit voltage (VOC) and power conversion efficiency (PCE) than Spiro-A despite having a lower built-in potential (VBI). Stabilise and pulse (SaP) measurements confirm that Spiro-B promotes charge accumulation by reducing interfacial recombination, thus increasing quasi-Fermi level splitting (QFLS). Furthermore, the carbazole-based reference SAM (Me-4PACz) achieves the highest VOC, demonstrating that direct charge injection is not always beneficial. These results challenge conventional molecular design strategies, emphasising the importance of controlling interfacial recombination over maximising charge injection. This work provides new insights for optimising SAMs in PSCs, offering a pathway toward higher efficiency through tailored energy barriers and charge accumulation dynamics.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Angus FJ, Mackenzie L, Giza M, Wilkinson D, Arca E, Palomares E, Li W, Docampo P, Cooke G

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Journal of Materials Chemistry A

Year: 2025

Volume: 13

Issue: 44

Pages: 38140-38148

Print publication date: 28/11/2025

Online publication date: 10/10/2025

Acceptance date: 01/10/2025

Date deposited: 07/01/2026

ISSN (print): 2050-7488

ISSN (electronic): 2050-7496

Publisher: Royal Society of Chemistry

URL: https://doi.org/10.1039/d5ta06749a

DOI: 10.1039/d5ta06749a

Data Access Statement: Data used to generate the main-text figures in this article are available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15544593. Additional supporting data are provided in the supplementary information (SI). Supplementary information: complete synthetic procedure for Spiro-B. Additional characterisation of Spiro-B. Note on TRPL analysis. XPS spectra of all materials used and a table of associated data. Complete device parameters obtained from J–V characterisation. Stabilise and pulse measurement, VFlat analysis and stabilisation data from SaP measurement for all devices. See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d5ta06749a


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Funding

Funder referenceFunder name
AGAUR (PID2019-109389RB-I00 and 2021 SGR 01261)
CERCA
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/X032116/1)
EPSRC (grants EP/V027425/1, EP/E036244/1, EP/T517896/1 and EP/N509668/1)
ESPRC (grants EP/T010569/1 and EP/T517896/1)
ICIQ
ICREA
Leverhulme Trust Research Fellowship
MSCA-COFUND I2: ICIQ Impulsion (GA 801474)
School of Chemistry, University of Glasgow
Spanish Government
Severo Ochoa grant MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 (CEX2019-000925-S)

Share