Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Manuel HerreraORCiD
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Inadequate railway drainage can trigger flooding, accelerate track degradation, and ultimately cause the sudden failure of tracks, slopes, and embankments. Routine visual inspections score each drainage asset’s service-level on a scale of one to five, yet existing prediction studies typically assume a linear mapping between readily measured drainage-asset characteristics (e.g., pipe material, shape, slope, and local rainfall) and those ordinal service-level grades. Such linearity greatly oversimplifies the nonlinear, multifactor deterioration processes that govern drainage performance. This study introduce a risk-based redefinition of service level based on the direction and magnitude of change between consecutive inspections (low, medium, or high risk). Using this reformulated target, we build and compare three supervised machine learning models, namely, multinomial logistic regression, random forests, and artificial neural networks, to predict the drainage asset’s future risk category from its physical, environmental, and operational attributes. The modeling framework explicitly tackles practical data challenges: misclassification bias in visual grades, repeated measurements of the same asset, severe class imbalance, and the categorical nature of most variables. The approach is demonstrated on two UK main-line routes (London–Cardiff and Edinburgh–Glasgow) comprising approximately 10,000 drainage assets. After careful oversampling, random forests delivered the highest recall for high-risk assets, outperforming the linear baseline and the other nonlinear model. Results confirm that abandoning the linearity assumption, redefining risk to capture service-level dynamics and applying tailored preprocessing markedly improved predictive accuracy and interpretability. This study therefore provides railway owners with a data-driven tool to prioritize drainage maintenance and reduce network disruption.
Author(s): Okazaki S, Herrera M, Sasidharan M, McNaughton J, Raja J, Parlikad AK
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Year: 2026
Volume: 32
Issue: 1
Print publication date: 01/03/2026
Online publication date: 02/01/2026
Acceptance date: 20/10/2025
Date deposited: 03/01/2026
ISSN (print): 1076-0342
ISSN (electronic): 1943-555X
Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
URL: https://doi.org/10.1061/JITSE4.ISENG-2614
DOI: 10.1061/JITSE4.ISENG-2614
ePrints DOI: 10.57711/sn32-bk50
Data Access Statement: Some or all data, models, or code used during the study were provided by Network Rail. Direct requests for these materials may be made to the provider as indicated in the Acknowledgements.
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric
