Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Lauren Darwin
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
As he faced conviction for sedition in 1793, Thomas Muir lamented ‘this trial is no trivial matter. It affects me, but it affects the country more.’ This statement echoes the sentiment of the time wherein the carrying out of British penal policy impinged on the autonomy of Scots law, which was protected by the 1707 Act of Union. During a period of heightened political tensions at home and abroad the state looked to deter challenges to authority, including sedition, by ensuring that justice was enacted in the harshest sense without provoking accusations of tyranny. However, the case of Muir and his fellow ‘Scottish Martyrs’ posed major contentions to the authorities in Edinburgh, Whitehall and New South Wales. This article examines the spaces in which the bounds of criminality, the definition of punishment and the distinctions between English and Scots law were played out—namely, the courtroom, the transport ship and the penal colony. It demonstrates that the journey of the Scottish Martyrs through the legal system was shaped by political and legal frictions between Scotland and England, which encouraged British and imperial discussions around freedoms, legislative power and penal policy.
Author(s): Bennett R, Darwin L
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Scottish Historical Review
Year: 2025
Volume: 104
Issue: 3
Pages: 460-485
Print publication date: 18/12/2025
Online publication date: 18/12/2025
Acceptance date: 25/07/2024
ISSN (print): 0036-9241
ISSN (electronic): 1750-0222
Publisher: Edinburgh University Press
URL: https://www.euppublishing.com/doi/abs/10.3366/shr.2025.0732
DOI: 10.3366/shr.2025.0732
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric
