Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

Spinal cord stimulation therapy for gait impairment in Parkinson’s disease: a double-blinded, randomised feasibility trial with an open extension

Lookup NU author(s): Professor Nicola PaveseORCiD

Downloads


Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND).


Abstract

© The Author(s) 2026.A trial of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) was performed in people with gait-impaired Parkinson’s (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05110053). Fourteen patients underwent gait assessments and [18F]-FDG and [18F]-FEOBV PET at baseline, six, and twelve months after SCS. Twelve participants were randomised to six-month MicroBurst or sham, followed by six-month extension with stimulation. The primary outcomes were feasibility and safety, as captured by the trial process measures and nature and frequency of adverse events, respectively, and the Postural Instability and Gait Disorder (PIGD) score as a clinical outcome. Secondary outcomes included assessments of balance and gait at home and at visits, including the Lower Body and Gait (LBG) score, imaging, and patient-reported outcomes of changes in gait, balance and quality of life. Seventeen patients (12%) were eligible for enrolment. Recruitment was feasible (1.2 participants/month) and SCS was well-tolerated. At six months, MicroBurst did not significantly improve gait compared with sham, although bradykinesia/rigidity improved. At 12 months, LBG scores improved (−4.31 points, p = 0.0012) with bilateral decreased thalamic metabolism and decreased right anterior insula [18F]-FEOBV uptake. The trial met its primary feasibility and safety endpoints by achieving recruitment targets and demonstrating that SCS was well-tolerated. However, it did not meet the primary clinical endpoint of a significant PIGD improvement at six months. Larger trials are warranted, as SCS may improve LBG and leg rigidity/bradykinesia, especially as time progresses. We reported data for power calculations and identified important risks for designing future trials.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Terkelsen MH, Hvingelby VS, Johnsen EL, Moller M, Danielsen EH, Henriksen T, Glud AN, Tai Y, Baun AM, Knudsen AL, Valdemarsen RN, Horsager J, Okkels N, Andersen ASM, Meier K, Borghammer P, Molloy S, Nandi D, Moro E, Sorensen JCH, Pavese N

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Nature Communications

Year: 2026

Volume: 17

Issue: 1

Print publication date: 04/03/2026

Online publication date: 29/01/2026

Acceptance date: 16/01/2026

Date deposited: 17/03/2026

ISSN (electronic): 2041-1723

Publisher: Nature Research

URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-68782-w

DOI: 10.1038/s41467-026-68782-w

Data Access Statement: The imaging data are available under restricted access for anonymity; access can be obtained by requests directed to the corresponding author, whowill review requests on acase-by-casebasis inaccordance with Danish legal and ethical regulations. Response can be expected within two weeks. All source data and clinical, individual-level data generated in this study are provided in the Supplementary Materials/ Source Data files. Source data are provided with this paper.

PubMed id: 41611672


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Funding

Funder referenceFunder name
Danish Council for Independent Research (0134-00305B, NP)

Share