Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

Effect of parathyroidectomy versus conservative management on bone mineral density in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism

Lookup NU author(s): Oday Al-Dadah

Downloads

Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.


Abstract

© 2026 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. Background: Hyperparathyroidism stimulates osteoclasts to increase bone resorption, release skeletal calcium, and cause a reduction of bone mass. Parathyroidectomy remains the only curative treatment however medical therapies can also control symptoms and limit osteoporosis. The aim of this study was to compare the impact of parathyroidectomy with medical management on bone mineral density (BMD) in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. Methods: An observational study including a total of 82 patients with hyperparathyroidism, comprising the Surgical Group (n=49) and Medical Group (n=33). Patients had BMD assessed at the lumbar spine, hip and forearm using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry before and after intervention. Results: At a mean follow-up of 4.3 years, BMD increased in the lumbar spine by +6.8% (P=0.004) in the Surgical Group and +3.1% (P=0.016) in the Medical Group. BMD was recovered or maintained in all regions in the Surgical Group, whereas a decrease of −7.1% (P=0.043) was noted in the forearms of the Medical Group. Significant between-group differences in BMD change favouring the Surgical Group in the total hip (+1.6% vs −1.7%, P=0.019), distal one-third radius (+0.3% vs −7.1%, P=0.045) and ultra-distal radius (+2.0% vs −9.1%, P=0.003). A greater proportion of patients in the Medical Group developed osteopenia or osteoporosis (P<0.001). Conclusions: This study has demonstrated that BMD improved or was preserved more greatly in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism who underwent parathyroidectomy rather than non-surgical management at 4 years follow-up. Greater BMD preservation in both groups, compared to previous studies, may be explained by greater utilisation of available medical therapies.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Green A, Hardy K, Al-Dadah O

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Diseases

Year: 2026

Pages: Epub ahead of print

Online publication date: 05/03/2026

Acceptance date: 02/04/2018

ISSN (print): 1879-7296

ISSN (electronic): 1879-730X

Publisher: Elsevier Masson SAS

URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anorl.2025.12.004

DOI: 10.1016/j.anorl.2025.12.004

PubMed id: 41791933


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Share