Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

Differences in Endoscopy Characteristics Between Providers With the Highest and Lowest Post Endoscopy Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Rates in England

Lookup NU author(s): Professor Matt Rutter, Dr David Beaton

Downloads


Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).


Abstract

© 2026 The Author(s). United European Gastroenterology Journal published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of United European Gastroenterology. Background: Post-endoscopy upper gastrointestinal cancer (PEUGIC) rates vary over threefold between endoscopy providers in England. To determine if variations in endoscopy characteristics contribute, providers with the lowest and highest PEUGIC rates were compared. Methods: Endoscopy providers were categorized into quartiles based on PEUGIC rates and those in the highest and lowest quartiles studied. Data for diagnostic upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopy performed between January 2019 and February 2020 were extracted from the National Endoscopy Database. Multivariable regression analysis explored the endoscopy characteristics associated with the lowest PEUGIC rate providers after adjusting for patient characteristics and indications. Results: In total, 328,354 diagnostic UGI endoscopy performed by 54 providers were included. Endoscopy characteristics positively associated with the lowest PEUGIC rate providers included: training sessions (Odds Ratio 1.85 (95% CI 1.81–1.90)); intravenous sedation use (1.09 (1.07–1.11)); endoscopist average UGI endoscopy annual volume 101–200 (1.05 (1.02–1.07) and 201–300 (1.16 (1.13–1.19)). Endoscopy characteristics inversely associated with the lowest PEUGIC rate providers included: endoscopy half-day sessions with average ≥ 9 points (0.72 (0.71–0.74)); endoscopists not on nursing, specialty or trainee register (0.83 (0.81–0.85)); and biopsies during endoscopy (0.84 (0.83–0.86)). Compliance with national quality standards to biopsy high risk conditions was better in providers with the lowest PEUGIC rates. Discussion: Training sessions, more endoscopists with minimum annual endoscopy volumes > 100, more intravenous sedation, less biopsies and lower intensity endoscopy sessions were associated with the lowest PEUGIC rate providers. These findings may help guide efforts to reduce PEUGIC and improve endoscopy quality in the future.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Kamran U, Evison F, Morris EJA, Brookes M, Rutter M, Beaton D, McCord M, Adderley NJ, Trudgill N

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: United European Gastroenterology Journal

Year: 2026

Volume: 14

Issue: 3

Online publication date: 02/04/2026

Acceptance date: 10/03/2026

Date deposited: 14/04/2026

ISSN (print): 2050-6406

ISSN (electronic): 2050-6414

Publisher: John Wiley and Sons Inc.

URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/ueg2.70206

DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.70206

Data Access Statement: The data that support the findings of this study are not available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions. We are grateful to the Joint Advisory Group on GI Endoscopy for access to data from the National Endoscopy Database.


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Funding

Funder referenceFunder name
National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) under its Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) Program (Grant Reference Number NIHR 201571)

Share