Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in ERCC6L2 disease

Lookup NU author(s): Dr Laura JardineORCiD

Downloads


Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).


Abstract

© 2026 American Society of HematologyThe hallmark of ERCC6L2 disease (ED) is a highly penetrant progression from bone marrow failure to erythroid-predominant, TP53-mutated myeloid malignancy with a dismal prognosis. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) remains the only potentially curative option, but concerns exist regarding transplant-related toxicities (TRT) due to the underlying DNA repair defect. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to report a systematic analysis of HSCT in ED. We conducted a retrospective multicenter study involving 45 patients with ED who underwent HSCT in 2004-2024. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS), TRT, and nonrelapse mortality (NRM). The 1-year and 3-year OS were 79% (95% confidence interval [CI], 66-91) and 54% (95% CI, 35-73), respectively. Previous history of excess blasts significantly predicted inferior survival (hazard ratio [HR], 6.8; 95% CI, 2.2-20.3; P < .001), with a median survival of 12 months (95% CI, 0-24). Grade 3 to 5 endothelial toxicities occurred in 27% of patients and were associated with higher NRM (HR, 7.7; 95% CI, 1.5-38.8; P = .016). The use of nontreosulfan-based myeloablative conditioning (MAC) regimens increased the risk of endothelial complications compared with reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC; HR, 4.9; 95% CI, 1.1-22.0; P = .040), whereas outcomes with treosulfan-based MAC were comparable to RIC. In summary, allogeneic HSCT is a viable curative strategy for ED when performed before transformation to an aggressive malignancy, for example myelodysplasia with excess blasts or acute myeloid leukemia. However, the elevated incidence of endothelial toxicity highlights the importance of optimizing conditioning intensity and enhancing peritransplant monitoring in this population.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Hakkarainen M, Sicre de Fontbrune F, Kaaja I, Douglas S, Dalle J-H, Risitano AM, Kulasekararaj A, Alsultan A, Cutler C, Ho VT, Hellstrom-Lindberg E, Mielke S, Myhre AE, Rihani R, Shanap MA, Hashem H, Shimamura A, Rowe RG, Auer F, Beier F, Desnica L, Hough R, Ali Jafri SR, Ayas M, Jardine L, Mellid EF, Corrales I, Richardson D, Ozbek NY, Zaniewska-Tekieli A, Gozdzik J, Ryhanen S, Niinimaki R, Jahnukainen K, Salmenniemi U, Kilpivaara O, Wartiovaara-Kautto U

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Blood Advances

Year: 2026

Volume: 10

Issue: 7

Pages: 2525-2537

Print publication date: 14/04/2026

Online publication date: 02/02/2026

Acceptance date: 07/01/2026

Date deposited: 21/04/2026

ISSN (print): 2473-9529

ISSN (electronic): 2473-9537

Publisher: American Society of Hematology

URL: https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2025018349

DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2025018349

PubMed id: 41628318


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Funding

Funder referenceFunder name
Cancer Foundation Finland
Helsinki University Library
Sigrid Juselius Foundation
Spanish Ministry of the Economy and Competitiveness
Research Council of Finland

Share