Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Professor Vijay KunadianORCiD
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.Background and Aims: Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) de-escalation strategies improve outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared to standard DAPT. However, the potential impact of sex on the safety and efficacy of these strategies is yet to be fully investigated. Methods: Randomized controlled trials comparing de-escalated vs standard DAPT regimens in patients without baseline indication for oral anticoagulation reporting outcomes stratified by sex were included. The co-primary endpoints were trial-defined major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and major bleeding. Hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were computed to account for different follow-up durations. A network meta-analysis including ranking of treatments was performed to explore the comparative effects of different DAPT de-escalation strategies among females and males. Results: Overall, 71 272 patients from 20 trials were included, and 23.3% were female. De-escalation strategies were grouped into (1) DAPT discontinuation, by aspirin or the P2Y12 inhibitor; or (2) P2Y12 inhibitor switch or dose reduction. With DAPT discontinuation vs standard DAPT, a significant interaction between treatment effect and sex was found for both MACE (Pint = .028) and major bleeding (Pint = .015). Indeed, DAPT discontinuation reduced MACE in females (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.75–0.98) but not in males (HR, 1.04; 95% CI 0.93–1.16), while reducing major bleeding in males (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.44–0.82) but not in females (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.76–1.43), compared to standard DAPT. Conversely, no interactions by sex were found with P2Y12 inhibitor switch or dose reduction vs standard DAPT for both MACE (Pint = .668) and major bleeding (Pint = .858). At treatment ranking, aspirin discontinuation ranked best for most outcomes in females, while P2Y12 inhibitor switch to clopidogrel showed the best outcomes in males. Conclusions: Sex may influence the safety and efficacy of antiplatelet de-escalation strategies after PCI, particularly those involving the shortening of DAPT. Aspirin discontinuation may represent the optimal strategy for females, while P2Y12 inhibitor switch to clopidogrel may be most effective for males.
Author(s): Occhipinti G, Laudani C, Galli M, Ortega-Paz L, Kunadian V, Mendieta G, Rinaldi R, Andreotti F, Mehran R, Lopez-Sobrino T, Capodanno D, Angiolillo DJ, Sabate Tenas M, Brugaletta S
Publication type: Review
Publication status: Published
Journal: European Heart Journal
Year: 2026
Volume: 47
Issue: 16
Pages: 1901-1913
Print publication date: 21/04/2026
Online publication date: 11/07/2025
Acceptance date: 17/06/2025
ISSN (print): 0195-668X
ISSN (electronic): 1522-9645
Publisher: Oxford University Press
URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf473
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf473
PubMed id: 40643264
