Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

Supra-Annular Self-Expanding Versus Intra-Annular Balloon-Expandable Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Meta-Analysis of Valve-Related Outcomes

Lookup NU author(s): Muntaser Omari, Dr Mohammad Alkhalil

Downloads


Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).


Abstract

© 2026 The Author(s). Published by IMR Press.Background: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an established treatment for severe aortic stenosis. The two most widely used platforms are either balloon-expandable intra-annular valve (BEV, Edwards) or self-expanding supra-annular valve (SEV) from Medtronic. Comparative data related to clinical and sub-clinical valve thrombosis are limited. The aim of this study-level meta-analysis is to evaluate its incidence and whether this translates into any difference in clinical outcomes. Methods: Electronic databases were searched from inception through to October 2025 to identify randomised clinical trials of patients receiving either platform. Rates of clinical and subclinical valve thrombosis were identified and compared between the two groups. Results: In five randomized controlled trials including 1877 patients, the risk of clinical and sub-clinical valve thrombosis was relatively low in both groups. There was a significant 81% reduction in clinical valve thrombosis in patients undergoing SEV compared to BEV [0.4% vs. 2.1%; rate ratio (RR) 0.19, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.04 to 0.86), p = 0.03]. Similarly, the risk of sub-clinical valve thrombosis was significantly lower in the SEV group [0.6% vs. 3.6%; RR 0.22, 95% CI (0.07 to 0.65), p = 0.006]. This difference was not translated into increased risk of stroke, valve re-intervention, or death. Conclusion: Patients undergoing TAVI using SEV compared to BEV have a lower risk of clinical and sub-clinical valve thrombosis in randomized trials, which is largely influenced by small annulus anatomy. Larger studies with longer term follow-up or using a dedicated imaging protocol may provide better insights into the clinical sequelae of this phenomenon.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Ali M, Paraskevi T, Omari M, Farag M, Kuzemczak M, Alkhalil M

Publication type: Review

Publication status: Published

Journal: Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine

Year: 2026

Volume: 27

Issue: 4

Print publication date: 01/04/2026

Online publication date: 21/04/2026

Acceptance date: 09/01/2026

ISSN (print): 1530-6550

ISSN (electronic): 2153-8174

Publisher: IMR Press Limited

URL: https://doi.org/10.31083/RCM48459

DOI: 10.31083/RCM48459

Data Access Statement: Data are available from the corresponding author on a reasonable request.


Share