Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

Vamorolone for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: A Cross-Trial Efficacy Comparison With Classic Corticosteroids From the FOR-DMD Trial

Lookup NU author(s): Dr Marianela SchiavaORCiD, Meredith JamesORCiD, Emerita Professor Katherine Bushby, Professor Michela GuglieriORCiD

Downloads


Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).


Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Vamorolone demonstrated similar efficacy for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) compared with prednisone in a 24-week exploratory analysis and may reduce key side effects compared with classic corticosteroids. In this study, we compare the efficacy and anthropometric effect of vamorolone 6 mg/kg/d with prednisone 0.75 mg/kg/d and deflazacort 0.9 mg/kg/d in steroid-naïve boys aged 4 to <7 years using data from 2 trials. METHODS: VISION-DMD was a phase 2b, 48-week randomized, double-blind trial assessing vamorolone 2 and 6 mg/kg/d vs placebo and prednisone 0.75 mg/kg/d to 24 weeks. Finding the Optimum Steroid Regimen for DMD (FOR-DMD) was a double-blind, parallel-group randomized trial comparing daily prednisone 0.75 mg/kg/d, daily deflazacort 0.9 mg/kg/d, and intermittent prednisone 0.75 mg/kg (10/10 days on/off). Entropy balancing generated weighted data for mixed model for repeated measures analyses that compared VISION-DMD vamorolone 6 mg/kg/d efficacy and anthropometric outcomes with FOR-DMD prednisone and deflazacort outcomes at 6 and 12 months. Inclusion criteria were boys with genetically confirmed DMD, age 4 to <7 years, ambulatory, and able to complete a time-to-stand (TTSTAND) assessment in <10 seconds at baseline. RESULTS: All interventions showed motor improvements relative to baseline at 6 and 12 months. Using the weighted cohorts and at 12 months, vamorolone 6 mg/kg/d (n = 28) had similar changes in TTSTAND velocity, the primary motor endpoint component in both trials, vs daily prednisone (n = 50) or deflazacort (n = 55; mean baseline age 5.42 years all groups), but with CIs overlapping minimal clinically important thresholds of 0.023 rises per second (TTSTAND velocity least squares mean [LSM] difference [95% CI]: vamorolone 6 mg/kg/d vs prednisone 0.75 mg/kg/d, 0.004 rises per second [-0.025 to 0.032] and vs deflazacort 0.9 mg/kg/d, 0.001 rises per second [-0.027 to 0.028]). Body mass index (BMI) Z-scores increased in all groups, greatest with vamorolone (12-month LSM difference [95% CI]: vamorolone vs prednisone 0.57 [0.24-0.90]; vamorolone vs deflazacort 0.29 [0.03-0.56]), whereas growth slowdown occurred in prednisone- and deflazacort-treated boys but not vamorolone (12-month LSM difference in height Z-scores [95% CI]: vamorolone vs prednisone 0.57 [0.24-0.90]; vamorolone vs deflazacort 0.72 [0.53-0.91]). DISCUSSION: Vamorolone demonstrated numerically similar TTSTAND velocity changes to prednisone and deflazacort at 1 year; however, interpretations of differences are limited by 95% CIs crossing minimally important difference thresholds. Further evidence of the growth-protective effect of vamorolone was observed; however, all treatments increased BMI. Vamorolone provides a linear growth-protective classic corticosteroid alternative. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: NCT03439670; NCT01603407. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This Class III study did not definitively identify differences in efficacy between vamorolone and classic corticosteroids but found that vamorolone protects linear growth in boys with DMD.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Clemens PR, Berglund A, Schiava M, James MK, McDermott MP, Bushby K, Lampa E, Rochford ETJ, Ward LM, Griggs RC, Hoffman EP, Guglieri M

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Neurology

Year: 2026

Volume: 107

Issue: 1

Print publication date: 14/07/2026

Online publication date: 27/05/2026

Acceptance date: 24/02/2026

Date deposited: 15/06/2026

ISSN (print): 0028-3878

ISSN (electronic): 1526-632X

Publisher: Wolters Kluwer Health

URL: https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000214756

DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000214756

Data Access Statement: Anonymized data not published within this article will be made available upon reasonable request from any qualified investigator. Specifically, the original VISION-DMD data may be provided after a Data Summary Request at the CINRG website (cinrgresearch.org/publications/data-summary-requests/) and after proposal approval with a signed data access agreement.

PubMed id: 42202243


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Funding

Funder referenceFunder name
European Commission Horizons 2020 (grant agreement number 667078)
Muscular Dystrophy Association
National Institute of Neurologic Diseases and Stroke (grants NS061799 and NS061795)
NIH grants (National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke R44NS095423; NICHD 5U54HD090254, NIAMS U34AR068616)
Parent Project for Muscular Dystrophy
Santhera Pharmaceuticals
Sarepta Therapeutics
PTC Therapeutics

Share