Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): David Towers, Dr Matthew ForshawORCiD, Dr Stephen McGough, Dr Amir Atapour AbarghoueiORCiD
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
It is a sad reflection of modern academia that code is often ignored after publication -- there is no academic 'kudos' for bug fixes / maintenance. Code is often unavailable or, if available, contains bugs, is incomplete, or relies on out-of-date / unavailable libraries. This has a significant impact on reproducibility and general scientific progress. Neural Architecture Search (NAS) is no exception to this, with some prior work in reproducibility. However, we argue that these do not consider long-term reproducibility issues. We therefore propose a checklist for long-term NAS reproducibility. We evaluate our checklist against common NAS approaches along with proposing how we can retrospectively make these approaches more long-term reproducible.
Author(s): Towers D, Forshaw M, McGough AS, Atapour-Abarghouei A
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: arXiv
Year: 2022
Pages: 4
Online publication date: 18/07/2022
Acceptance date: 11/07/2022
Date deposited: 05/08/2026
Publisher: arXiv
URL: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2207.04821
DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2207.04821
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric