Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

Young People’s Valuations of Managing Compromised Molars: A Discrete Choice Experiment

Lookup NU author(s): Greig Taylor, Professor Catherine ExleyORCiD, Professor Luke ValeORCiD, Professor Chris VernazzaORCiD

Downloads

Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.


Abstract

© International Association for Dental, Oral, and Craniofacial Research and American Association for Dental, Oral, and Craniofacial Research 2026. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).Introduction: Limited evidence exists to support optimal patient-centered management for compromised first permanent molars (cFPMs) in young people. Young people’s preferences are important when planning their health care. Objectives: This study aimed to elicit young people’s preferences for pathways to manage cFPMs. Methods: An online discrete choice experiment (DCE) was completed by young people (aged 12–16) from the United Kingdom. The design was informed by the literature, interviews with young people, and a concurrent adult-focused DCE. A statistically optimal d-efficient design generated 18 choice tasks across two blocks. Each respondent answered 1 block of 9 tasks. Choice tasks varied across four characteristics: treatment type, care provider, management decision-maker, and number of future visits avoided. An opt-out (no treatment) was included. Conditional (fixed effects) logit models were used for data analysis. Results: In total, 122 young people completed the DCE. Restoring a cFPM was preferred to having a partial gap, prosthetic replacement with a bridge, orthodontic closure, or a full-unit gap. Preferences ranged from no preference to a preference for spontaneous closure compared to a restoration (odds ratio = 1.40; 95% confidence interval, 0.98–1.99; P = 0.063). Young people had no preference for the health professional providing their care (general dentist, dentist with enhanced skills, or a specialist pediatric dentist). Participants did not have a clear preference for whether treatment decisions were made by the dentist alone, the patient alone, or on a shared decision-making basis between patient, parent, and dentist. Conclusion: Young people wished to manage cFPMs and expressed preferences for restorations rather than any other management, resulting in a gap, and for orthodontic or prosthetic closure. They want and should be included as part of a shared decision-making process for these teeth, rather than their preferences being assumed solely by parental proxies. Young people aged 12 to 16 were able to understand and complete this DCE. Knowledge Transfer Statement: Young people (aged 12–16) attending primary and secondary care dental clinics in the United Kingdom clearly expressed preferences on how compromised first permanent molars should be managed. They want and should be included as part of a shared decision-making process for these teeth, rather than their preferences being assumed solely by parental proxies.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Taylor GD, Boyers D, Exley C, Innes N, Vale L, Vernazza CR

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: JDR Clinical and Translational Research

Year: 2026

Pages: epub ahead of print

Online publication date: 01/07/2026

Acceptance date: 02/04/2018

ISSN (print): 2380-0844

ISSN (electronic): 2380-0852

Publisher: Sage Publications Ltd.

URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/23800844261452554

DOI: 10.1177/23800844261452554


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Share