Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

Artificial urinary sphincter surgery in the UK: are we following the guidelines?

Lookup NU author(s): Professor Christopher HardingORCiD

Downloads


Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).


Abstract

© 2026, Royal College of Surgeons of England. All rights reserved.Introduction Artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) is a guideline-recommended treatment for male stress urinary incontinence. Despite its widespread use, it is thought that there is no standardisation in AUS practice. This study aims to report current AUS insertion practices in the UK and highlight any discrepancies. Methods A REDCap survey was conducted under the British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) Section of Female, Neurological, and Urodynamic Urology, and reported using the CHERRIES checklist. Outcomes were framed using the International Continence Society (ICS) document and recent BAUS consensus document. Results The survey received 34 responses (response rate: 44–94%). Most respondents (80%) used video-urodynamics and patient-reported outcomes in patient workup. Loss of compliance on urodynamics was the most common contraindication, and detrusor overactivity was often treated before AUS surgery. Perioperative preparation and implantation techniques varied significantly from the ICS document, as did complication management. Conclusions The reported variation may result from local or national influences, a lack of high-quality evidence and divergent surgical training. This variability impacts the heterogeneity of outcomes and their reporting. Future efforts should focus on adopting the new national consensus to standardise practice, improving training curricula, researching the effects of variability on surgical outcomes and enhancing the quality of evidence in this field.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Bhatt NR, Doherty R, Biers S, Harding C, Thiruchelvam N, Belal M, Sahai A, Hashim H

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England

Year: 2026

Volume: 108

Issue: 6

Pages: 457-464

Print publication date: 01/07/2026

Online publication date: 15/12/2025

Acceptance date: 16/10/2025

Date deposited: 20/07/2026

ISSN (print): 0035-8843

ISSN (electronic): 1478-7083

Publisher: Royal College of Surgeons of England

URL: https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2025.0104

DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2025.0104


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Share