Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

Use of circulating tumour DNA to prospectively guide a switch from targeted to immune therapy in BRAF mutant advanced melanoma: the randomised phase II CAcTUS trial

Lookup NU author(s): Professor Ruth PlummerORCiD

Downloads


Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).


Abstract

© The Author(s) 2026.Checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy (CPI) for BRAF mutant advanced melanoma first-line results in a better long-term survival compared to targeted therapy (TT), however TT induction may benefit poor prognosis groups. The parallel-arm, randomised phase II, multicentre, feasibility CAcTUS trial (Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03808441) randomised 21 patients to receive standard of care investigators choice TT or CPI, switching to the alternative upon progression (n = 10), or commencing TT and switching to CPI upon an ≥80% reduction of BRAF variant allele frequency (VAF) in circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA; n = 11). The study achieved its primary endpoints with 100% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 94-100%) of critical results provided within 7 days to inform a decision to switch and 100% of patients commencing TT achieving an ≥80% reduction of BRAF VAF (95% CI: 80-100%). Secondary outcomes included progression-free survival and overall survival. No new safety signals were observed for TT/CPI. Post-hoc analysis of clinical features, circulating cytokines and chemokines at ctDNA nadir following TT induction suggested a more favourable profile prior to CPI initiation. Longitudinal ctDNA dynamics revealed ctDNA provided an early signal of CPI benefit and that rechallenge with TT following CPI progression resulted in a further ctDNA response. These data support the utility of ctDNA to guide treatment decision-making within a clinically relevant timeframe to optimise treatment scheduling strategies.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Lee RJ, Rothwell DG, Smith N, Chow S, Delgado-SanMartin J, Mistry H, Sylvestre Y, Chiang S-C, Clarke H, Gremel G, Gupta A, Hockenhull K, Kelso N, Kochhar R, Mullan D, Plummer R, Serra P, Shaw H, Summersgill H, Turajlic S, Mouliere F, Marais R, Dive C, Lorigan P

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Nature Communications

Year: 2026

Volume: 17

Issue: 1

Print publication date: 22/07/2026

Online publication date: 21/05/2026

Acceptance date: 24/04/2026

Date deposited: 04/08/2026

ISSN (electronic): 2041-1723

Publisher: Nature Research

URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-72735-8

DOI: 10.1038/s41467-026-72735-8

Data Access Statement: The study protocol is available in the Supplementary Information. Individual patient-level clinical data cannot be provided for ethical reasons. Sharing of additional clinical data not within the manuscript or in supplementary materials will be considered upon request to the Sponsor (The Christie NHS Foundation Trust) and Chief Investigator Prof. Paul Lorigan. The remaining data are available within the article, Supplementary Information or Source data file. Source data are pro vided with this paper.The code is available here: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19337944.

PubMed id: 42168180


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Funding

Funder referenceFunder name
CRUK National Biomarker Centre (NBC, CTRNBC-2022/100001)
CRUK/NIHR Experi mental Cancer Medicines Centre
CRUK Manchester Centre (CTRQQR-2021\100010)
CRUK Manchester Institute core funding from CRUK (C5759/A20971, C5759/A27412)
Manchester Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) (NIHR203308)
Manchester Biomedical Research Centre (NIHR203308)
National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR)
Wellcome Trust Early Career Fel lowship grant number (225724/Z/22/Z)

Share