Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

Characterising Hepatitis D Virus in the UK From 2011 to 2021

Lookup NU author(s): Professor Stuart McPhersonORCiD

Downloads


Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).


Abstract

© 2026 The Author(s). Journal of Viral Hepatitis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Little is known about hepatitis B virus (HBV) and Hepatitis D virus (HDV) coinfection in the UK. HDV screening is recommended among all individuals with HBV, with coinfection associated with increased disease progression. Using data on HDV testing, shared by 11 laboratories in the UK who reported undertaking HDV testing, and national testing data for HBV we established a cohort of individuals tested for HDV, investigating testing pathways, describing characteristics and outcomes of those HDV-RNA positive to inform targeted interventions for testing, diagnosis and linkage to care. Demographic information, clinical assessments, treatment and recent laboratory results from NHS trusts, and through linkage to national healthcare datasets was collected for HDV-RNA positive individuals. Between 2011 and 2021, 42% of individuals newly diagnosed with HBV in England were linked to an HDV test. Anti-HDV positivity was 5.0%, 55.8% were HDV-RNA tested and 45.7% were ever HDV-RNA positive. HDV-RNA positivity in the absence of an anti-HDV result was 6.4%. Among individuals who were HDV-RNA positive, 94.3% were non-UK born, with 24 different primary languages reported, 49% had evidence of treatment, and 48% had evidence of cirrhosis. 10% had died of which 58.4% died of liver disease. In conclusion, our findings indicate that HDV testing in HBV positive individuals in the UK is sub-optimal against testing guidelines, including RNA testing among those who are anti-HDV positive. Considerable work is needed to improve the patient care pathway, to ensure patients are appropriately diagnosed, linked and retained in care, with adequate access to treatment.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Simmons R, Ijaz S, Jackson R, Jack K, Mulongeni R, Raghu R, Riddell A, Elsharkawy A, Uriel A, Koffas A, Chaika A, Lawson A, Cole A, McEwan A, Brown A, Stone B, Levick C, Byrne D, Forton D, MacDonald D, Forde D, Nastouli E, Barnes E, Sumner E, Page E, Carey I, Vilar FJ, Maggs J, Collier J, Shepherd J, Agarwal K, Bicknell K, Ala K, Dear K, Ratcliffe L, Bruce M, Zhang H, Rivett L, Maes M, Ankcorn M, Aldersley M, Prince M, Lemoine M, Foxton M, Wright M, Cramp M, Wiselka M, Easom N, Richardson P, Gunson R, Herbert R, Blackwell R, Jelley R, Aspinall R, Simpson R, Clewes R, Ahmad S, McPherson S, Ryder S, Verma S, Lampejo T, Sathyanarayana V, Gelson W, Leeman D, Desai M, Mandal S, Kennedy PT, Irving WL

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Journal of Viral Hepatitis

Year: 2026

Volume: 33

Issue: 9

Print publication date: 01/09/2026

Online publication date: 09/08/2026

Acceptance date: 12/06/2026

Date deposited: 19/08/2026

ISSN (print): 1352-0504

ISSN (electronic): 1365-2893

Publisher: John Wiley and Sons Inc.

URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jvh.70205

DOI: 10.1111/jvh.70205

Data Access Statement: The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

PubMed id: 42572155


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Funding

Funder referenceFunder name
Gilead Sciences, IN-UK-980-6339

Share