Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

Comparing Two Frailty Tools for the Prediction of Mortality in Older People Admitted to Hospital in Tanzania: A Prospective Cohort Study

Lookup NU author(s): Dr Sean Davidson, Amie Murray, Dr Emma Mitchell, Professor Richard Walker, Dr Catherine DotchinORCiD

Downloads


Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).


Abstract

© 2026 The Author(s). Health Science Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. Background: Healthcare systems in low- and middle-income countries are under pressure to adapt services for ageing populations, and frailty screening has gained interest as a means of identifying older adults at risk of adverse outcomes. Aims: The aim of this study was to examine two frailty instruments for the prediction of mortality in older adults admitted to hospital in Tanzania. Methods: This study followed 308 people, aged ≥ 60 years, admitted to four hospitals in the Kilimanjaro Region between March and August 2022. Baseline frailty was assessed using the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) and the Brief Frailty Instrument for Tanzania (B-FIT). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, with secondary outcomes of length of stay and change in functional status. Cox regression estimated hazard ratios (HRs) for mortality, with Harrell's C statistic and receiver operator characteristics used to compare instrument performance. Results: Follow-up data were available for 194 participants (63%). After a mean of 10.8 months of follow-up, adjusted models demonstrated frailty was associated with higher mortality (CFS HR 2.26, 95% CI 1.34–3.83; B-FIT HR 2.63, 95% CI 1.45–4.77, p = 0.001). The two instruments showed similar discriminatory power. Neither was associated with length of stay. Among survivors, frailty was associated with decline in physical function, but not social function. Conclusions: Frailty screening, using either the CFS or B-FIT, offered a feasible method for identifying older adults at the greatest risk of adverse outcomes. Such tools should be investigated as a means of targeting limited resources towards the most vulnerable older adults in an African setting.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Davidson SL, Murray A, Hardy J, Randall T, Lyimo G, Trinitas JK, Rayers G, Bickerstaff E, Emmence L, Nobes S-MM, Chuwa M, Kisheo F, Kisaruni E, Mitchell E, Urasa S, Walker RW, Dotchin CL

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Health Science Reports

Year: 2026

Volume: 9

Issue: 8

Online publication date: 17/08/2026

Acceptance date: 28/07/2026

Date deposited: 01/09/2026

ISSN (print): 2398-8835

ISSN (electronic): 2398-8835

Publisher: John Wiley and Sons Inc.

URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.72974

DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.72974

Data Access Statement: The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Share