Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

Practice based, longitudinal, qualitative interview study of computerised evidence based guidelines in primary care

Lookup NU author(s): Dr Nicolette Rousseau, Professor Elaine McCollORCiD, Professor Martin Eccles

Downloads


Abstract

Objective: To understand the factors influencing the adoption of a computerised clinical decision support system for two chronic diseases in general practice. Design: Practice based, longitudinal, qualitative interview study. Setting: Five general practices in north east England. Participants: 13 respondents (two practice three nurses, and eight general practitioners) gave a total of 19 semistructured interviews. 40 people in practices included in the randomised controlled trial (34 doctors, three nurses) and interview study (three doctors, one previously interviewed) gave feedback. Results: Negative comments about the decision support system significantly outweighed the positive or neutral comments. Three main areas of concern among clinicians emerged: timing of the guideline trigger, ease of use of the system, and helpfulness of the content. Respondents did not feel that the system fitted well within the general practice context. Experience of "on-demand" information sources, which were generally more positively viewed, informed the comments about the system. Some general practitioners suggested that nurses might find the guideline content more clinically useful and might be more prepared to use a computerised decision support system, but lack of feedback from nurses who had experienced the system limited the ability to assess this. Conclusions: Significant barriers exist to the use of complex clinical decision support systems for chronic disease by general practitioners. Key issues include the relevance and accuracy of messages and the flexibility to respond to other factors influencing decision making in primary care.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Rousseau N, McColl E, Newton J, Grimshaw J, Eccles M

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: British Medical Journal

Year: 2003

Volume: 326

Issue: 7384

Pages: 314-321

Print publication date: 08/02/2003

Date deposited: 18/10/2010

ISSN (print): 0959-8138

ISSN (electronic): 1756-1833

Publisher: BMJ Group

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.326.7384.314

DOI: 10.1136/bmj.326.7384.314

PubMed id: 12574046

Notes: TY - JOUR RP - IN FILE


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Share