Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Luc Racaut
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
This essay published in an edited volume is 6,000 words long and explores astrology (an particularly Nostradamus) in the context of religious debate and the emergence of modern scientific thought. Abstract: The opposition between superstition and reason has coloured our understanding of the Reformation debate since the Enlightenment. Around this time Protestantism was irremediably associated with reason and Catholicism with superstition. It is useful to replace the terms of this debate in the context of sixteenth-century discussions about astrology because it was thought to be intrinsically superstitious. Catholic and Protestant attitudes towards astrology and superstition can be usefully compared. In recent scholarship, Protestants are depicted has being more critical of astrology than Catholics. Astrology was not a monolithic whole, and there were deep divisions that were drawn between natural and superstitious astrology. A survey of the literature can help understand the distinction and moderate the hypothesis that Protestants rejected astrology whereas Catholics embraced it.
Author(s): Racaut L
Editor(s): Parish H; Naphy WG
Series Editor(s): Bergin J; Naphy WG; Roberts P; Rossi P
Publication type: Book Chapter
Publication status: Published
Book Title: Religion and superstition in Reformation Europe
Series Title: Studies in Early Modern European History
Publisher: Manchester University Press
Place Published: Manchester
Library holdings: Search Newcastle University Library for this item