Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Emeritus Professor Ken Willis, Professor Guy Garrod
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
The overwhelming majority of commercial forestry in the UK comprises blanket nonnative coniferous species with low biodiversity levels. The UK government is committed under the Rio Principles and Helsinki Guidelines to conserve and enhance biodiversity in British forests and woodlands. This paper assesses the passive use value of biodiversity in remote non-visited coniferous forests, and the costs of diversification and restructuring. Focus groups were employed to aid the design and framing of the study. An iterative bidding polychotomous choice format was used to elicit willingness-to-pay values for different biodiversity standards and management options. Whilst, passive use benefits exceeded costs for biodiversity conservation, considerable ambivalence in choice occurred between different levels of biodiversity. The policy relevance of the results are discussed, and compared to the practical implementation measures for biodiversity being adopted by the Forestry Commission.
Author(s): Willis KG, Garrod GD
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: The Environmentalist
Year: 1998
Volume: 18
Issue: 3
Pages: 157-166
Print publication date: 01/01/1998
ISSN (print): 0251-1088
ISSN (electronic): 1573-2991
Publisher: Springer
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1006698016933
DOI: 10.1023/A:1006698016933
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric