Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Bill Bevir
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
This article examines the ways in which E. B. Bax and R. G. Collingwood attempted to avoid relativism and irrationalism without postulating a pure and universal reason. Both philosophers were profound historicists who recognized the fundamentally particular nature of the world. Yet they also attempted to retain a universal aspect to thought -Bax through his distinction between the logical and alogical realms, and Collingwood through his doctrine of re-enactment. The article analyses both their metaphysical premises and their philosophies of history. Finally an attempt is made to use their arguments as starting-points from which to arrive at a historicist resolution of the problems of relativism and irrationalism.
Author(s): Bevir M
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: History of the Human Sciences
Year: 1999
Volume: 12
Issue: 3
Pages: 55-69
Print publication date: 01/08/1999
ISSN (print): 0952-6951
ISSN (electronic): 1461-720X
Publisher: Sage Publications Ltd.
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09526959922120342
DOI: 10.1177/09526959922120342
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric