Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Jane Hutton
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
The inverse of a difference in probabilities, called the 'number needed to treat', has been promoted in the medical literature as a good way to present the results of modelling binary outcomes. The usual context is randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses. In this paper we discuss the claims that have been made about this statistic, and the problems associated with it. Methods which have been proposed for confidence intervals are evaluated and shown to be erroneous. We suggest that the difference in probabilities, the 'absolute risk reduction', is preferable to the number needed to treat, for both theoretical and practical reasons.
Author(s): Hutton JL
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A: Statistics in Society
Year: 2000
Volume: 163
Issue: 3
Pages: 403-419
Print publication date: 01/01/2000
ISSN (print): 0964-1998
ISSN (electronic): 1467-985X
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2680522