ePrints

Fraud in medical research: An international survey of biostatisticians

Lookup NU author(s): Dr Jane Hutton

Downloads

Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.

Abstract

The characteristics of scientific fraud and its impact on medical research are in general not well known. However, the interest in the phenomenon has increased steadily during the last decade. Biostatisticians routinely work closely with physicians and scientists in many branches of medical research and have therefore unique insight into data. In addition, they have methodological competence to detect fraud and could be expected to have a professional interest in valid results. Biostatisticians therefore are likely to provide reliable information on the characteristics of fraud in medical research. The objective of this survey of biostatisticians, who were members of the International Society for Clinical Biostatistics, was to assess the characteristics of fraud in medical research. The survey was performed between April and July 1998. The participation rate was only 37%. We report the results because a majority (51%) of the participants knew about fraudulent projects, and many did not know whether the organization they work for has a formal system for handling suspected fraud or not. Different forms of fraud (e.g., fabrication and falsification of data, deceptive reporting of results, suppression of data, and deceptive design or analysis) had been observed in fairly similar numbers. We conclude that fraud is not a negligible phenomenon in medical research, and that increased awareness of the forms in which it is expressed seems appropriate. Further research, however, is needed to assess the prevalence of different types of fraud, as well as its impact on the validity of results published in the medical literature. Control Clin Trials 2000;21:415-427 Copyright (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc.

Publication metadata

Author(s): Ranstam J, Buyse M, George SL, Evans S, Geller NL, Scherrer B, Lesaffre E, Murray G, Edler L, Hutton JL, Colton T, Lachenbruch P

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Controlled Clinical Trials

Year: 2000

Volume: 21

Issue: 5

Pages: 415-427

ISSN (print): 0197-2456

ISSN (electronic): 1559-2030

Publisher: Elsevier

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0197-2456(00)00069-6

DOI: 10.1016/S0197-2456(00)00069-6

PubMed id: 11018560

Altmetrics

Share