Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Professor Barbara HanrattyORCiD, Professor Carl May
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
This paper explores the relationship between palliative medicine and the wider medical world. It draws on data from a focus group study in which doctors from a range of specialties talked about developing palliative care for patients with heart failure. In outlining views of the organisation of care, participants engaged in a process of negotiation about the roles and expertise of their own, and other, specialties. Our analysis considers the expertise of palliative medicine with reference to its technical and indeterminate components. It shows how these are used to promote and challenge boundaries between medical specialities and with nursing. The boundaries constructed on palliative medicine's technical contribution to care are regarded as particularly coherent within orthodox medicine. In contrast, its indeterminate expertise, represented by the 'holistic' and 'psychosocial' agendas, is potentially compromising in a medical world that prizes science and rationality. We show how the coherence of both kinds of expertise is contested by moves to extend palliative care beyond its traditional temporal (end-of-life) and pathological (cancer) fields of practice. © 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
Author(s): Hibbert D, Hanratty B, May C, Mair F, Litva A, Capewell S
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Social Science and Medicine
Year: 2003
Volume: 57
Issue: 2
Pages: 277-288
Print publication date: 01/07/2003
ISSN (print): 0277-9536
ISSN (electronic): 1873-5347
Publisher: Pergamon
URL: http://dx.doi.org.10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00346-5
DOI: 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00346-5
PubMed id: 12765708
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric
