Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr James StachORCiD,
Dr Luis Maldonado,
Emeritus Professor Alan Ward,
Professor Michael Goodfellow,
Professor Alan Bull
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
In this study, we redesigned and evaluated primers for the class Actinobacteria. In silico testing showed that the primers had a perfect match with 82% of genera in the class Actinobacteria, representing a 26-213% improvement over previously reported primers. Only 4% of genera that displayed mismatches did so in the terminal three bases of the 3′ end, which is most critical for polymerase chain reaction success. The primers, designated S-C-Act-0235-a-S-20 and S-C-Act-0878-a-A-19, amplified an ≈640 bp stretch of the 16S rRNA gene from all actinobacteria tested (except Rubrobacter radiotolerans) up to an annealing temperature of 72°C. An Actinobacteria Amplification Resource (http://microbe2.ncl.ac.uk/MMB/AAR.htm) was generated to provide a visual guide to aid the amplification of actinobacterial 16S rDNA. Application of the primers to DNA extracted from marine and terrestrial samples revealed the presence of actinobacteria that have not been described previously. The use of 16S rDNA similarity and DNA-DNA pairing correlations showed that almost every actinomycete clone represented either a new species or a novel genus. The results of this study reinforce the proposition that current culture-based techniques drastically underestimate the diversity of Actinobacteria in the environment and highlight the need to evaluate taxon-specific primers regularly in line with improvements in databases holding 16S rDNA sequences.
Author(s): Stach JEM, Maldonado LA, Ward AC, Goodfellow M, Bull AT
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Environmental Microbiology
ISSN (print): 1462-2912
ISSN (electronic): 1462-2920
PubMed id: 14510836
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric