Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr James Armstrong
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
The term 'safety critical' applies to a wide range of technologies, from car braking systems, through trains and their signalling systems, to advanced air and space technology, both civil and military. It is a rather sophisticated euphemism for 'dangerous'; and like the word 'safe', it suggests the existence of some spectral but inherent property beneficial to human health that could be lost under certain conditions, but does not have to be. How far can the discourse about safety be trusted? And why are debates about risk sometimes so heated? In this paper it is proposed that literary theory, particularly work on 'deconstruction' by philosopher Jacques Derrida, can shed some light on these questions. Unsurprisingly, deconstruction cannot say much to safety engineers about the technicalities of system building. But then again questions about whether and why we continue to build and rely upon safety critical technologies are not simply technical; the language used in them is almost always politically charged.
Author(s): Armstrong J
Publication type: Review
Publication status: Published
Journal: Interdisciplinary Science Reviews
Year: 2003
Volume: 28
Issue: 2
Pages: 83-94
ISSN (print): 0308-0188
ISSN (electronic): 1743-2790
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/030801803225005166
DOI: 10.1179/030801803225005166
