Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

Starch digestion, large-bowel fermentation and intestinal mucosal cell proliferation in rats treated with the α-glucosidase inhibitor acarbose

Lookup NU author(s): Professor John Mathers


Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.


Acarbose (Glucobay®; Bayer) is an α-glucosidase inhibitor used to treat diabetes and which may have a role in the prevention of type 2 diabetes. The present study investigated the effects of acarbose treatment on the site and extent of starch digestion, large-bowel fermentation and intestinal mucosal cell proliferation. Eighteen young male Wistar rats were fed 'Westernised' diets containing 0, 250 and 500 mg acarbose/kg (six rats/diet) for 21 d. For most variables measured, both acarbose doses had similar effects. Acarbose treatment suppressed starch digestion in the small bowel but there was compensatory salvage by bacterial fermentation in the large bowel. This was accompanied by a substantial hypertrophy of small- and large-bowel tissue and a consistent increase in crypt width along the intestine. Caecal total SCFA pool size was increased more than 4-fold, with even bigger increases for butyrate. These changes in butyrate were reflected in increased molar proportions of butyrate in blood from both the portal vein and heart. There was little effect of acarbose administration on crypt-cell proliferation (significant increase for mid-small intestine only). This is strong evidence against the hypothesis that increased fermentation and increased supply of butyrate enhances intestinal mucosal cell proliferation. In conclusion, apart from the increased faecal loss of starch, there was no evidence of adverse effects of acarbose on the aspects of large-bowel function investigated. © The Authors 2004.

Publication metadata

Author(s): Dehghan-Kooshkghazi M, Mathers JC

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: British Journal of Nutrition

Year: 2004

Volume: 91

Issue: 3

Pages: 357-365

ISSN (print): 0007-1145

ISSN (electronic): 1475-2662

Publisher: Cambridge University Press


DOI: 10.1079/BJN20031063

PubMed id: 15005821


Altmetrics provided by Altmetric