Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Professor Cam Donaldson, Dr Philip Shackley
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
Despite the acceptance that health gain is the most important attribute of health care, other aspects of health care may affect utility. The aim of this paper is to report an experiment to test the impact of providing different levels of information in the context of the EuroWill study, a joint contingent valuation (CV) of multiple health programmes. Three hundred and three respondents were simultaneously asked for their willingness-to-pay (WTP) for three health care programmes: more HEART operations, a new BREAST CANCER treatment and a HELICOPTER AMBULANCE service. To test for the impact of variation in information, three versions of one of the programmes (HEART) were provided. Results show that WTP for all three programmes tended to be significantly higher for respondents who were provided additional positive information about the HEART programme. Our results show that CV of health care programmes, which only take into account medical outcomes, may lead to the value of such programmes not being adequately estimated, and that the impact of information may even be more decisive in the context of joint evaluation of multiple, rather than single, programmes. © 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Author(s): Protiere C, Donaldson C, Luchini S, Moatti JP, Shackley P
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Social Science and Medicine
Year: 2004
Volume: 58
Issue: 7
Pages: 1257-1269
Print publication date: 01/04/2004
ISSN (print): 0277-9536
ISSN (electronic): 1873-5347
Publisher: Pergamon
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00321-6
DOI: 10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00321-6
PubMed id: 14759674
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric
