Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Professor Cam Donaldson, Dr Philip Shackley
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
When applying willingness-to-pay (WTP) in economic evaluations, there have been strong theoretical arguments for the use of ex ante insurance-based questions, which can be framed either as insurance premiums or taxation contributions. This paper suggests theoretical reasons why respondents may value a programme differently in these two different ex ante approaches, and inquires empirically into the potential existence of such differences. A split-sample interview study was undertaken in Denmark. The proportion of respondents willing to pay is higher in the community version, and the respondents use different reasons for being and not being willing to pay. © 2004 Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
Author(s): Olsen JA, Kidholm K, Donaldson C, Shackley P
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Health Policy
Year: 2004
Volume: 70
Issue: 2
Pages: 217-228
Print publication date: 01/11/2004
ISSN (print): 0168-8510
ISSN (electronic): 1872-6054
Publisher: Elsevier
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2004.03.005
DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2004.03.005
PubMed id: 15364151
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric