Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

Estimation of podocyte number: A comparison of methods

Lookup NU author(s): Dr Kathryn White, Professor Rudy Bilous


Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.


Background. The podocyte is the focus of much research into the mechanisms of renal disease progression, and the number of podocytes per glomerulus has thus become a parameter of much interest. When counting podocytes, the actual particle counted is the cell nucleus. The majority of published studies estimating podocyte number have used the method of Weibel and Gomez (1962). This makes assumptions about the shape and size of the cell nuclei and therefore has an inherent bias. In our studies we have used a more recent stereologic method - the disector/fractionator-that makes no assumptions about the shape or size of the cell nuclei and is therefore free of bias. Methods. We set out to compare the two methods, in both type 1 diabetic patients and normal controls, to determine whether eliminating bias and thus improving accuracy had any effect on the overall results. The Weibel-Gomez method estimates cell number from a single section through the glomerulus, whereas the disector/fractionator requires the glomerulus to be serially sectioned. Results. There was no significant difference between mean values obtained by the two methods, providing that the Weibel-Gomez estimate was performed on electron micrographs. However, the overall variance was high for all groups of patients, independent of the method employed. Conclusion. Although the disector/fractionator is the theoretic gold standard method for podocyte number estimation, comparable estimates can be obtained by the Weibel-Gomez method provided they are made from electron micrographs. Thus the technical resources available may determine the choice of method employed. Investigators should be aware of the high degree of variability in the estimate, particularly when trying to detect small changes in podocyte number.

Publication metadata

Author(s): White KE, Bilous RW

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Kidney International

Year: 2004

Volume: 66

Issue: 2

Pages: 663-667

ISSN (print): 0085-2538

ISSN (electronic): 1523-1755

Publisher: Nature Publishing Group


DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00787.x

PubMed id: 15253720


Altmetrics provided by Altmetric