Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Simon Kendall
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
Background: In recent years there has been a growth in the use of the telephone consultation for healthcare problems. This has developed, in part, as a response to increased demand for GP and accident and emergency department care. Aim: To assess the effects of telephone consultation and triage on safety, service use, and patient satisfaction. Design of study: We looked at randomised controlled trials, controlled studies, controlled before/after studies, and interrupted time series of telephone consultation or triage in a general healthcare setting. Setting: All healthcare settings were included but the majority of studies were in primary care. Method: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EPOC specialised register, PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, SIGLE, and the National Research Register and checked reference lists of identified studies and review articles. Two reviewers independently screened studies for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed study quality. Results: Nine studies met our inclusion criteria: five randomised controlled trials; one controlled trial; and three interrupted time series. Six studies compared telephone consultation with normal care; four by a doctor, one by a nurse, and one by a clinic clerk. Three of five studies found a significant decrease in visits to GPs but two found an increase in return consultations. In general at least 50% (range = 25.5-72.2%) of calls were handled by telephone consultation alone. Of seven studies reporting accident and emergency department visits, six showed no difference between the groups and one - of nurse telephone consultation - found an increase. Two studies reported deaths and found no difference between nurse telephone consultation and normal care. Conclusions: Although telephone consultation appears to have the potential to reduce GP workload, questions remain about its effect on service use. Further rigorous evaluation is needed with emphasis on service use, safety, cost, and patient satisfaction. © British Journal of General Practice.
Author(s): Bunn F, Byrne G, Kendall S
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: British Journal of General Practice
Year: 2005
Volume: 55
Issue: 521
Pages: 956-961
ISSN (print): 0960-1643
ISSN (electronic): 1478-5242
Publisher: Royal College of General Practitioners
PubMed id: 16378566
