Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

Anaesthesia and post-operative analgesia following experimental surgery in laboratory rodents: Are we making progress?

Lookup NU author(s): Dr Claire Richardson, Emeritus Professor Paul FlecknellORCiD


Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.


Current attitudes to the use of animals in biomedical research require that any pain or distress should be minimised. This can often be achieved by the use of appropriate anaesthetic and analgesic regimens. There, is however, little information on the peri-operative regimens used. A literature review was conducted to estimate how commonly analgesics are administered to laboratory rodents, the most widely used species of laboratory animals, and to assess the anaesthetic regimens employed. Studies describing potentially painful experimental procedures involving rodents were identified from peer-reviewed journals published from 1990 to 1992 and from 2000 to 2002. In papers published between 2000 and 2002, if analgesic administration was not specified, the institutional veterinary surgeons or authors of the papers were contacted by e-mail to obtain additional information on analgesic use. From 1992 to 2002, there was an increase in the reported prevalence of analgesic administration to laboratory rodents from 2.7% to 19.8%. Although the use of analgesics has increased over the past ten years, the overall level of post-operative pain relief for laboratory rodents is still low. Anaesthetic methodology changed markedly between the two time-periods sampled. Notably, there was an increase in the use of isoflurane and of injectable anaesthetic combinations such as ketamine/xylazine, whereas the use of ether and methoxyflurane decreased.

Publication metadata

Author(s): Richardson CA, Flecknell PA

Publication type: Review

Publication status: Published

Journal: ATLA Alternatives to Laboratory Animals

Year: 2005

Volume: 33

Issue: 2

Pages: 119-127

Print publication date: 01/04/2005

ISSN (print): 0261-1929

ISSN (electronic):


PubMed id: 16180987