Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

Behaviourally mediated indirect effects: Interference competition increases predation mortality in foraging redshanks

Lookup NU author(s): Dr Jeroen Minderman

Downloads

Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.


Abstract

1. The effect of competition for a limiting resource on the population dynamics of competitors is usually assumed to operate directly through starvation, yet may also affect survival indirectly through behaviourally mediated effects that affect risk of predation. Thus, competition can affect more than two trophic levels, and we aim here to provide an example of this. 2. We show that the foraging success of redshanks Tringa totanus (L.) foraging on active prey was highest in the front of flocks, whereas this was not the case for redshanks foraging on inactive prey. Also, when foraging on active prey, foraging success in a flock decreased as more birds passed through a patch, while overall foraging success was not lower on subsequent visits to the same patch. Thus, redshanks foraging on active prey suffered from interference competition, whereas this was not the case for redshanks foraging on inactive prey. 3. This interference competition led to differences in activity: redshanks attaining a lower foraging success had a higher walking rate. Greater activity was associated with wider flock spacing and shorter distances to cover, which has previously been shown to increase predation risk and mortality from sparrowhawks Accipiter nisus (L.). 4. We conclude that behavioural adaptations of prey species can lead to interference competition in foraging redshanks, and thus can affect their predation risk and mortality through increased activity. This study is one of the first to show how interference competition can be a mechanism for behaviourally mediated indirect effects, and provides further evidence for the suggestion that a single species occupying an intermediate trophic level may be simultaneously top-down controlled by a predator and bottom-up controlled by a behavioural response of its prey. © 2006 The Authors.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Minderman J, Lind J, Cresswell W

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Journal of Animal Ecology

Year: 2006

Volume: 75

Issue: 3

Pages: 713-723

ISSN (print): 0021-8790

ISSN (electronic): 1365-2656

Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01092.x

DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01092.x

PubMed id: 16689954


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Share